Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 13:00:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:59:58 -0500 Received: from ns.ithnet.com ([217.64.64.10]:17682 "HELO heather.ithnet.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 12:59:43 -0500 Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 18:59:40 +0100 From: Stephan von Krawczynski To: "Mike Black" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17 Message-Id: <20011222185940.6a646662.skraw@ithnet.com> In-Reply-To: <002701c18adf$b9f0f140$ac542341@cfl.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <002701c18adf$b9f0f140$ac542341@cfl.rr.com> Organization: ith Kommunikationstechnik GmbH X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.6.6 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 06:56:44 -0500 "Mike Black" wrote: > My thanks to for Marcelo's efforts...but.... > > Is there any way we can get Marcelo, Rik, and Andrea to work together on the > "stable" version now (a Linux tribunal)? Would you mind to give us a short hint on the implicit "instability" you are exactly talking about? I think 2.4.17 is in various ways well worked out and maintained. There are further improvements possible for sure, but that is a normal thing. Anyway I cannot really see any major instability issues that require instant brainstorming. I am confident in Marcelo's maintenance. Regards, Stephan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/