Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Message-ID: <43a47609b43641bd74f96d86783f984295e3d87d.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: x86: add more information to the kvm_entry
 tracepoint
From:   Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Date:   Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:41:30 +0300
In-Reply-To: <27053c89-e11c-e16d-ef88-89b3cd99c487@redhat.com>
References: <20230924124410.897646-1-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
         <20230924124410.897646-3-mlevitsk@redhat.com>
         <27053c89-e11c-e16d-ef88-89b3cd99c487@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-2.fc32) 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

У вт, 2023-09-26 у 18:39 +0200, Paolo Bonzini пише:
> On 9/24/23 14:44, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > +		__field(	u32,		inj_info	)
> > +		__field(	u32,		inj_info_err	)
> > +		__field(	bool,		guest_mode	)
> > +		__field(	bool,		req_imm_exit	)
> > +		),
> 
> As anticipated in patch 1 I'm not so sure about adding req_imm_exit here 
> but also (especially) in kvm_exit.  I do believe it should be traced, 
> I'm not sure it's needed in kvm_entry+kvm_exit as opposed to just a 
> separate tracepoint.


I will drop guest_mode.

Best regards,
	Maxim Levitsky


> 
> Paolo
>