Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758112AbXKMMEN (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:04:13 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757380AbXKMMDx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:03:53 -0500 Received: from rhun.apana.org.au ([64.62.148.172]:1569 "EHLO arnor.apana.org.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757073AbXKMMDv (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:03:51 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:03:28 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: David Miller Cc: kaber@trash.net, joonwpark81@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu, cfriesen@nortel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode Message-ID: <20071113120328.GB1086@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <47397AB3.90705@trash.net> <20071113.033611.73195922.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071113.033611.73195922.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1624 Lines: 40 On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 03:36:11AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > > The performance implications can be pretty severe however. > I wish we could address this somehow. Or perhaps we should just teach everyone to always run tcpdump with -p, like me :) Of course this would still have a negative impact on those who have to be in promiscuous mode all the time (heh) due to multiple unicast MAC addresses and such. However, we should able to communicate that fact to the driver and the driver can then elect to not disable VLAN acceleration unless we really want to be in promiscuous mode. In other words we can make it so that nobody is in promiscuous mode and therefore have to disable VLAN acceleration *unless* they really want to be in that state. In which case it would imply that they wish to see everything and therefore we should disable VLAN acceleration. So that means I'd like to see our current core/driver interface enhanced so that whether the user has requested us to be in promiscuous mode can be differentiated from whether the network stack wants us to be. Once we have that then I would think that such a patch would be less controversial. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/