Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758708AbXKMMTc (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:19:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754267AbXKMMTW (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:19:22 -0500 Received: from stinky.trash.net ([213.144.137.162]:43725 "EHLO stinky.trash.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753676AbXKMMTV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:19:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4739961E.90708@trash.net> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:18:38 +0100 From: Patrick McHardy User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.4 (X11/20070828) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Herbert Xu CC: David Miller , joonwpark81@gmail.com, w@1wt.eu, cfriesen@nortel.com, auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, djohnson+linux-kernel@sw.starentnetworks.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] [e1000 VLAN] Disable vlan hw accel when promiscuous mode References: <20071113.033611.73195922.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113120328.GB1086@gondor.apana.org.au> <20071113.040624.43544149.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113121647.GA1330@gondor.apana.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20071113121647.GA1330@gondor.apana.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1386 Lines: 31 Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:06:24AM -0800, David Miller wrote: >>> In other words we can make it so that nobody is in promiscuous >>> mode and therefore have to disable VLAN acceleration *unless* >>> they really want to be in that state. In which case it would >>> imply that they wish to see everything and therefore we should >>> disable VLAN acceleration. >> This is too complicated, we have multiple unicast MAC support >> in the driver API already, let's simply use it. > > Yes I agree. People not using Patrick's new API deserves to > get poor performance so they can switch over sooner :) > > What I was trying to say above is that e1000 currently uses > the old set_multicast_list interface (rather than dev_set_rx_mode) > so it's not immediately obvious why we're in promiscuous mode. > We could look at dev->promiscuity - !!uc_count but that feels a > bit fragile. > > Perhaps those who want to push this patch should be encouraged > to convert e1000 to the new interface :) I already posted a patch for this, not sure what happened to it. Auke, any news on merging the secondary unicast address support? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/