Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 17:44:06 +0200
From:   Uwe =?utf-8?Q?Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To:     Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
Cc:     Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jirislaby@kernel.org,
        shawnguo@kernel.org, s.hauer@pengutronix.de,
        ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
        alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, lukas@wunner.de,
        p.rosenberger@kunbus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] serial: imx: do not set RS485 enabled if it is not
 supported
Message-ID: <20230929154406.c2xvll4iecd6nq5e@pengutronix.de>
References: <20230928221246.13689-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <20230928221246.13689-7-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de>
 <20230929063942.qukemr4o7l5vdmud@pengutronix.de>
 <8fac0a79-cf0b-f35b-4e5e-e8f502bb5367@gmx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nopdae4ryx4v5ekg"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <8fac0a79-cf0b-f35b-4e5e-e8f502bb5367@gmx.de>
Precedence: bulk


--nopdae4ryx4v5ekg
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello Lino,

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> On 29.09.23 08:39, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 12:12:46AM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@kunbus.com>
> >
> > I don't know how picky Greg is here, but formally you missed to add an
> > S-o-b line for the sender of this patch (i.e. you with your gmx
> > address).
> >
>=20
> Hm, until now there have never been complaints about this. Is this really=
 an issue? Of
> course I can also S-o-b with my gmx address but adding two S-o-b's for th=
e same person seems
> a bit odd to me...

The obvious and easy fix is of course to use the author address to send
the patches. :-)

Best regards
Uwe

--=20
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

--nopdae4ryx4v5ekg
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEP4GsaTp6HlmJrf7Tj4D7WH0S/k4FAmUW8MUACgkQj4D7WH0S
/k7fFgf/VtW24r6XZ/vfBGnv50SL4uW1TpgvNgOSKJbZATkxzxBr1V+FnxXG30Ip
vf9ptBnSAIajdgxU6BLqrDe19QaXZWQE5QMxvGsR4LZtAWQ7553NhtcPSE6czgW0
vqQlP/X5x48PMyCojx+1Ntsf21NXrwSIkUkEP4oHF54XfesWyOErL9z6MZ00HK8X
6/vQ3LA1mpnwuAI+AE23lHjciyLR0jJA1aXKKF5szFN4HW72ADc/BzcsUmSQTctO
d2ZO8kGs/tiJ4+3+I80cqcC+3+8CQXKflPEz/77MPwxCo25FSc02Yz2TjO+0Yq5v
JPpeYh2hmpN54n8Bgb3uRS8TrNiRkg==
=86ry
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nopdae4ryx4v5ekg--