Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760465AbXKMR4r (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:56:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757078AbXKMR4f (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:56:35 -0500 Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de ([141.84.69.5]:44119 "EHLO mailhub.stusta.mhn.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755986AbXKMR4e (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:56:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 18:56:10 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Theodore Tso , Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Miller , protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Message-ID: <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113034916.2556edd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.035824.40509981.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113041259.79c9a8c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113134029.GA30978@elte.hu> <4739AFE0.20705@rtr.ca> <40f323d00711130752k19cab8eauc3456721274b3267@mail.gmail.com> <20071113171356.GA25824@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071113171356.GA25824@thunk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1943 Lines: 48 On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros > > (gentoo->ubuntu) > > and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I > > know this isn't a lkml problem > > but more a distro problem, but I would love having an ubuntu blessed > > repo with current dev kernel > > for the latest stable ubuntu release). > > There are two parts to this. One is a Ubuntu development kernel which > we can give to large numbers of people to expand our testing pool. > But if we don't do a better job of responding to bug reports that > would be generated by expanded testing this won't necessarily help us. >... The main problem aren't missing testers [1] - we already have relatively experienced people testing kernels and/or reporting bugs, and we slowly scare them away due to the many bug reports without any reaction. The main problem is finding experienced developers who spend time on looking into bug reports. Getting many relatively unexperienced users (who need more guidance for debugging issues) as additional testers is therefore IMHO not necessarily a good idea. > - Ted cu Adrian [1] and e.g. when Greg says he has a few hundred people who want to write drivers it would most likely be possible to find a few dozen additional -rc testers among them -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/