Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3784:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id jk4csp175369rdb; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:20:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IESxp77K0r+cIYXeL1IRxpAU/q7BqL5394GvXNaaHv1hKZjunLNxPawwY956RSOl8xVLN/a X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:24c5:b0:68f:dcc1:4bef with SMTP id d5-20020a056a0024c500b0068fdcc14befmr8362777pfv.7.1696054818850; Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:20:18 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1696054818; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZPLKB3emMpIB2OBZzJraLh5u1x5X2x8lo/ja/s2h6S5HwXDEm84PnH6rp1ajq9+7lh 6vLNWTvqfic46zthY+VMCsVwqxlMG6UdRWfy+FHTsQwtRiozH6jldKJUVeugbFRBt9C0 3wxnFWT1/JTJ+jw1mhompuP6SZD/OXHkWr1sQSvzFbiv0f2YOngF7CcXKUHhK1QDl+ra wQEZ+jHHxp7+380NoGrowTPrDWiHV/djuvj3/ipOHEQ2cmurzkkeNN4R1VN+5+TYCqFz YQglUASP57XllDTol3ZIVY07rdaYBwUfYHg5gKGqaRp+U7672HY8vuhzKdTakletQRgX E59A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=q5AsP2pL02lMfUlKbi7xvy8gtw8AsWZMtdlUjlJ+cT8=; fh=Xt7BTWUko/WIqQAsbqjha3IKa8sJHMcwHBJLNSQ8Pns=; b=z7U/yLh7EmHWqQhksVnMV/oggatxDi2vB4H17fj+XhfTHDX6apPEXgldAbQ3bu5UbK GGPrKH4sYRJQIFBE7w4jHPl5DWIkRJXm6/WT5WfMsRU2uu9+snxGhgrdQSgmAOO5cQyF BmBiopjEFvWc7LX1IafJ04Tb5jdyS9BJzkbOcNpsxBu3llQvfxFLajBN6g+tCaFVcAZ6 RybouYykBr8nCoycoyAXKKJOKLqv1EQieEUd8TO29KcotfWXqnecXfe/5JShzwUWtuHr /SPNmZ1a4nx+wG6wjQFJqxBDqFaWLde1Vx+mMQ2XMeFjR+QQbicuIiqmvYbw+8voudXm Wy2w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eOCnXY+U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from pete.vger.email (pete.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:6]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t22-20020a056a0021d600b00690b80126b9si22779368pfj.142.2023.09.29.23.20.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=eOCnXY+U; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by pete.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B13D806C602; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:27:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at pete.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231697AbjI1J0s (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 05:26:48 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40642 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231705AbjI1JZy (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 05:25:54 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BA63CF7 for ; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:25:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1695893101; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q5AsP2pL02lMfUlKbi7xvy8gtw8AsWZMtdlUjlJ+cT8=; b=eOCnXY+UO3c1w77e0wqScEoJtcOuNyG39Mu9szOXCn1sOUIpcQuJMpDkl22mtFThgwBwfH DG0BibogpaLfg9TJnHGsBE0wOP0BDKQlvYtmTROtk7FCUnfOSacCp5JrI9vmR7m5MLnHVN mS9IZ+IJYbVa66Nq0nrx4ItCoAEPMB4= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx-ext.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-315-iFy5JBxcOli0N8dLBbKI5A-1; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 05:24:54 -0400 X-MC-Unique: iFy5JBxcOli0N8dLBbKI5A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F34D1C00BA9; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora (unknown [10.72.120.2]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2E6E40C2064; Thu, 28 Sep 2023 09:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 17:24:42 +0800 From: Ming Lei To: Yu Kuai Cc: linan666@huaweicloud.com, josef@toxicpanda.com, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, nbd@other.debian.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linan122@huawei.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com, houtao1@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" Subject: Re: [PATCH] nbd: pass nbd_sock to nbd_read_reply() instead of index Message-ID: References: <20230911023308.3467802-1-linan666@huaweicloud.com> <47669fb6-3700-e327-11af-93a92b0984a0@huaweicloud.com> <41161d21-299c-3657-6020-0a3a9cf109ec@huaweicloud.com> <60f9a88b-b750-3579-bdfd-5421f2040406@huaweicloud.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <60f9a88b-b750-3579-bdfd-5421f2040406@huaweicloud.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.1 X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on pete.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (pete.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Thu, 28 Sep 2023 02:27:20 -0700 (PDT) On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 05:06:40PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2023/09/28 16:57, Ming Lei 写道: > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 04:55:03PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > 在 2023/09/28 15:40, Ming Lei 写道: > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 02:03:28PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > 在 2023/09/28 12:05, Ming Lei 写道: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:33:08AM +0800, linan666@huaweicloud.com wrote: > > > > > > > From: Li Nan > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If a socket is processing ioctl 'NBD_SET_SOCK', config->socks might be > > > > > > > krealloc in nbd_add_socket(), and a garbage request is received now, a UAF > > > > > > > may occurs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > T1 > > > > > > > nbd_ioctl > > > > > > > __nbd_ioctl > > > > > > > nbd_add_socket > > > > > > > blk_mq_freeze_queue > > > > > > > T2 > > > > > > > recv_work > > > > > > > nbd_read_reply > > > > > > > sock_xmit > > > > > > > krealloc config->socks > > > > > > > def config->socks > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Pass nbd_sock to nbd_read_reply(). And introduce a new function > > > > > > > sock_xmit_recv(), which differs from sock_xmit only in the way it get > > > > > > > socket. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am wondering why not grab queue usage counter before calling nbd_read_reply() > > > > > > for avoiding such issue, something like the following change: > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c > > > > > > index df1cd0f718b8..09215b605b12 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/block/nbd.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/block/nbd.c > > > > > > @@ -837,9 +837,6 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work) > > > > > > while (1) { > > > > > > struct nbd_reply reply; > > > > > > - if (nbd_read_reply(nbd, args->index, &reply)) > > > > > > - break; > > > > > > - > > > > > > /* > > > > > > * Grab .q_usage_counter so request pool won't go away, then no > > > > > > * request use-after-free is possible during nbd_handle_reply(). > > > > > > @@ -852,6 +849,9 @@ static void recv_work(struct work_struct *work) > > > > > > break; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > This break how nbd works, if there is no reply yet, recv_work() will > > > > > wait for reply in: > > > > > > > > > > nbd_read_reply > > > > > sock_xmit > > > > > sock_recvmsg > > > > > > > > > > After this change, recv_work() will just return if there is no io. > > > > > > > > OK, got it, thanks for the input. > > > > > > > > But I feel it isn't necessary & fragile to store one extra reference of nsock in > > > > `recv_thread_args`. > > > > > > > > Just run a quick look, the only potential UAF on config->socks should be recv_work(), > > > > so you can retrieve the `nsock` reference at the entry of recv_work(), > > > > > > I don't understand what you mean retrieve the 'nsock', is following what > > > you expected? > > > > > > blk_queue_enter() -> prevent concurrent with nbd_add_socket > > > nsock = config->socks[args->index] > > > blk_queue_exit() > > > > Yeah, turns out you do understand, :-) > > Ok, I was not sure about this blk_queue_enter(). By the way, this blk_queue_enter() isn't exported, but you can grab ->config_lock for getting the `nsock`. > remind me of what you did to fix uaf of access queue->mq_hctx[] by > convert the array to xarray. > > > Maybe it's better to covert config->socks[] to xarray to fix this uaf as > well? ->socks[idx] is needed in nbd fast path, so xarray may not be one good idea since xarray_load() introduces extra load, especially ->socks[] uaf should exist in recv_work() very likely. For other cases, the active block request holds queue usage counter. Thanks, Ming