Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:28:41 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>
To:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] mmap: Fix error paths with dup_anon_vma()
Message-ID: <843f059f-dd54-4481-b46a-e87e56274db3@lucifer.local>
References: <20230929183041.2835469-1-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
 <20230929183041.2835469-3-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20230929183041.2835469-3-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 02:30:40PM -0400, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> When the calling function fails after the dup_anon_vma(), the
> duplication of the anon_vma is not being undone.  Add the necessary
> unlink_anon_vma() call to the error paths that are missing them.
>
> This issue showed up during inspection of the error path in vma_merge()
> for an unrelated vma iterator issue.
>
> Users may experience increased memory usage, which may be problematic as
> the failure would likely be caused by a low memory situation.
>
> Fixes: d4af56c5c7c6 ("mm: start tracking VMAs with maple tree")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Liam R. Howlett <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>
> ---
>  mm/mmap.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index acb7dea49e23..f9f0a5fe4db4 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -583,11 +583,12 @@ static inline void vma_complete(struct vma_prepare *vp,
>   * dup_anon_vma() - Helper function to duplicate anon_vma
>   * @dst: The destination VMA
>   * @src: The source VMA
> + * @dup: Pointer to the destination VMA when successful.
>   *
>   * Returns: 0 on success.

Being a bit nitpicky/refactory here, but anon_vma_clone() appears to have
two possible return values - 0 for success, and -ENOMEM.

As a result, it's not really gaining us much passing through this value.

It'd be nice if dup_anon_vma() and anon_vma_clone() were therefore updated
to instead return NULL on ENOMEM and the dst otherwise.

Then we could de-clunk this whole code path, and the quite natural fact of
'thing didn't return a pointer therefore had no memory to allocate it' fals
out.

But this isn't exactly an earth-shattering concern :)

>   */
>  static inline int dup_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> -			       struct vm_area_struct *src)
> +		struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_struct **dup)
>  {
>  	/*
>  	 * Easily overlooked: when mprotect shifts the boundary, make sure the
> @@ -595,9 +596,15 @@ static inline int dup_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
>  	 * anon pages imported.
>  	 */
>  	if (src->anon_vma && !dst->anon_vma) {
> +		int ret;
> +
>  		vma_assert_write_locked(dst);
>  		dst->anon_vma = src->anon_vma;
> -		return anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> +		ret = anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		*dup = dst;
>  	}
>
>  	return 0;
> @@ -624,6 +631,7 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	       unsigned long start, unsigned long end, pgoff_t pgoff,
>  	       struct vm_area_struct *next)
>  {
> +	struct vm_area_struct *anon_dup = NULL;
>  	bool remove_next = false;
>  	struct vma_prepare vp;
>
> @@ -633,7 +641,7 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>
>  		remove_next = true;
>  		vma_start_write(next);
> -		ret = dup_anon_vma(vma, next);
> +		ret = dup_anon_vma(vma, next, &anon_dup);
>  		if (ret)
>  			return ret;
>  	}
> @@ -661,6 +669,8 @@ int vma_expand(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  	return 0;
>
>  nomem:
> +	if (anon_dup)
> +		unlink_anon_vmas(anon_dup);
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>
> @@ -860,6 +870,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  {
>  	struct vm_area_struct *curr, *next, *res;
>  	struct vm_area_struct *vma, *adjust, *remove, *remove2;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *anon_dup = NULL;
>  	struct vma_prepare vp;
>  	pgoff_t vma_pgoff;
>  	int err = 0;
> @@ -927,18 +938,18 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  		vma_start_write(next);
>  		remove = next;				/* case 1 */
>  		vma_end = next->vm_end;
> -		err = dup_anon_vma(prev, next);
> +		err = dup_anon_vma(prev, next, &anon_dup);
>  		if (curr) {				/* case 6 */
>  			vma_start_write(curr);
>  			remove = curr;
>  			remove2 = next;
>  			if (!next->anon_vma)
> -				err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr);
> +				err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr, &anon_dup);
>  		}
>  	} else if (merge_prev) {			/* case 2 */
>  		if (curr) {
>  			vma_start_write(curr);
> -			err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr);
> +			err = dup_anon_vma(prev, curr, &anon_dup);
>  			if (end == curr->vm_end) {	/* case 7 */
>  				remove = curr;
>  			} else {			/* case 5 */
> @@ -954,7 +965,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  			vma_end = addr;
>  			adjust = next;
>  			adj_start = -(prev->vm_end - addr);
> -			err = dup_anon_vma(next, prev);
> +			err = dup_anon_vma(next, prev, &anon_dup);
>  		} else {
>  			/*
>  			 * Note that cases 3 and 8 are the ONLY ones where prev
> @@ -968,7 +979,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  				vma_pgoff = curr->vm_pgoff;
>  				vma_start_write(curr);
>  				remove = curr;
> -				err = dup_anon_vma(next, curr);
> +				err = dup_anon_vma(next, curr, &anon_dup);
>  			}
>  		}
>  	}
> @@ -1018,6 +1029,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct *vma_merge(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct mm_struct *mm,
>  	return res;
>
>  prealloc_fail:
> +	if (anon_dup)
> +		unlink_anon_vmas(anon_dup);
> +
>  anon_vma_fail:
>  	vma_iter_set(vmi, addr);
>  	vma_iter_load(vmi);
> --
> 2.40.1
>

Other than the nice-to-have, this looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@gmail.com>