Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760515AbXKMT0W (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:26:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755319AbXKMT0K (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:26:10 -0500 Received: from rtr.ca ([76.10.145.34]:2495 "EHLO mail.rtr.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752594AbXKMT0H (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:26:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4739FA4D.1050900@rtr.ca> Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 14:26:05 -0500 From: Mark Lord User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk Cc: Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Miller , protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs References: <20071113.035824.40509981.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113041259.79c9a8c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113134029.GA30978@elte.hu> <4739AFE0.20705@rtr.ca> <20071113164650.GA28493@elte.hu> <4739E3D0.10201@rtr.ca> <20071113181228.GF4250@stusta.de> <4739EA83.5040006@rtr.ca> <20071113183605.GG4250@stusta.de> <4739F12E.5020807@rtr.ca> <20071113190428.GH4250@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071113190428.GH4250@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1409 Lines: 36 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 01:47:10PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: >> Adrian Bunk wrote: .. > Another point is that it shifts the work from the few experienced > developers to the many users. Users (and voluntary testers) we have > many, but developer time for debugging bug reports is a quite scarce > resource. > >> And when a "maintainer" is too busy to find/fix their own bugs, >> that could be a sign that they've bitten off too big of a chunk >> of the kernel, and it's time for them to distribute code maintainership. > > The problem is: Maintainers don't grow on trees. .. Hey, if somebody has time to break things, then they damn well ought to be able to make time to fix them again. And the best developers here on LKML do just that (fix what they break). You broke it, you fix it. A simple rule. Translation for the particularly daft: If you've been making significant updates to a driver/subsystem, and people are reporting that it is now broken for them, then it's your job to make it right. The reporters can help, and many may even git-bisect or send patches. But you cannot *expect* or *insist* upon them doing your job. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/