Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S282902AbRLVWzv>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:55:51 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S282906AbRLVWzm>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:55:42 -0500
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:54796 "EHLO
	the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S282902AbRLVWz1>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 17:55:27 -0500
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.17
To: wizard@eznet.net
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 23:05:44 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-Reply-To: <3C24CD00.CD3EF09@eznet.net> from "David A. Frantz" at Dec 22, 2001 01:12:17 PM
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <E16HvD6-0005b8-00@the-village.bc.nu>
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Now this may seem a bit demanding but consider this.    If the users of this
> list did not have prior knowledge of the kernels available on www.kernel.org
> how would they know which ones to avoid totally, which ones are OK, and which
> ones seem to be well done?    Its really a shame that we need to talk about a

They would go to a vendor who is prepared to say "We tested this, we put
our logo on the package saying we have faith in it"



Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/