Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
Date:   Sat, 30 Sep 2023 09:17:05 -0700
From:   Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To:     Fenglin Wu <quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
        agross@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        linux-input@vger.kernel.org, quic_collinsd@quicinc.com,
        quic_subbaram@quicinc.com, quic_kamalw@quicinc.com,
        jestar@qti.qualcomm.com, Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v6 3/3] input: pm8xxx-vibrator: add new SPMI
 vibrator support
Message-ID: <ZRhKAWYBLcBZHc73@google.com>
References: <20230922083801.3056724-1-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
 <20230922083801.3056724-4-quic_fenglinw@quicinc.com>
 <CAA8EJpoW8DJOTVHBu9_+BQs5DtxyJu3xrCfDNyYHn2MeHZHV4w@mail.gmail.com>
 <12887370-0ada-359b-8a4f-18a28495c69a@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <12887370-0ada-359b-8a4f-18a28495c69a@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 10:54:45AM +0800, Fenglin Wu wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9/24/2023 3:07 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > > +
> > > +       switch (vib->data->hw_type) {
> > > +       case SSBI_VIB:
> > >                  mask = SSBI_VIB_DRV_LEVEL_MASK;
> > >                  shift = SSBI_VIB_DRV_SHIFT;
> > > +               break;
> > > +       case SPMI_VIB:
> > > +               mask = SPMI_VIB_DRV_LEVEL_MASK;
> > > +               shift = SPMI_VIB_DRV_SHIFT;
> > > +               break;
> > > +       case SPMI_VIB_GEN2:
> > > +               mask = SPMI_VIB_GEN2_DRV_MASK;
> > > +               shift = SPMI_VIB_GEN2_DRV_SHIFT;
> > > +               break;
> > > +       default:
> > > +               return -EINVAL;
> > Could you please move the switch to the previous patch? Then it would
> > be more obvious that you are just adding the SPMI_VIB_GEN2 here.
> > 
> > Other than that LGTM.
> 
> Sure, I can move the switch to the previous refactoring patch.

Actually, the idea of having a const "reg" or "chip", etc. structure is
to avoid this kind of runtime checks based on hardware type and instead
use common computation. I believe you need to move mask and shift into
the chip-specific structure and avoid defining hw_type.

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry