Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762682AbXKMUWV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:22:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760277AbXKMUV7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:21:59 -0500 Received: from palrel10.hp.com ([156.153.255.245]:33953 "EHLO palrel10.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759104AbXKMUV6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 15:21:58 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:21:54 -0700 From: Alex Chiang To: Greg KH Cc: gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects Message-ID: <20071113202154.GA22812@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Chiang , Greg KH , gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, matthew@wil.cx, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20071113000853.GA13341@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20071113170129.GA20185@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071113170129.GA20185@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1733 Lines: 45 * Greg KH : > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 05:08:53PM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > > > > Recently, Matthew Wilcox sent out the following mail about > > PCI slots: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=119432330418980&w=2 > > > > The following patch series is a rough first cut at > > implementing the ideas he outlined, namely, that PCI slots > > are physical objects that we care about, independent of their > > hotplug capabilities. > > Also, some companies already provide userspace tools to get all > of this information about the different slots in a system and > what is where, from userspace, no kernel changes are needed. > So, why add all this extra complexity to the kernel if it is > not needed? On HP ia64 systems, that information is locked away in ACPI, and there's no easy way to get at it. Alex Williamson tried providing a generic dev_acpi driver, so that userspace could do whatever they wanted to with the information: http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/8/3/106 And that effort kinda died. I'm of mixed feelings on that driver, since it would be really nice to get unfettered access to the ACPI namespace, but it's pretty dangerous, since any interesting thing you might want to do is actually a method (aka, it calls into firmware) and who knows what side effects there might be. So from my point of view, if ia64 customers want to know about the slots they have in their systems, we're gonna have to do something kernel-intrusive anyhow. Thanks. /ac - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/