Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3784:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id jk4csp940237rdb; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGBnPr9ZU/Q0ucXoIE3q+kMY/QTuq5Z3Rgo+DdbW1e6a4Lzrj7dMrL7vQDAWeJG8BAu32pl X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2da1:b0:68f:cdf3:dd54 with SMTP id fb33-20020a056a002da100b0068fcdf3dd54mr9430812pfb.9.1696186923316; Sun, 01 Oct 2023 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1696186923; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SFsdL41fmN2cSniW2/DG0rEQ2Gb04+c3MDkieumwh3aotP7zeB1ge8MbbYe3sJH8p3 /28DYTaIFiYjrReovZxAfv/3GOiLfXwMItrQmVOiOzpKTG99QSXeCfTu72NUt6kBWoA8 StVsEgvH1fahTIPD3HOvOUMDePU6yHoBCJg8m58//WfTlm0WB8gcVHT601lQM40+yktl 3lar6fKahDO2AwdBnNlcCQPxlc3SGa4SNpHfasvXrvUq9o/MiDxc0E8cvK3otqV9yp8I c4y1TpTcZ1HIcg7BNntvDPhI+3GZu7n1w6cZUNjqxMqsD9cVIzMUnmuFmYazWJ3iQDWk eSZA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=lc37+9Wf6oT4IK3MkJtkwXsbvBv8PcMeKjjthDFjYkA=; fh=Xf8gFuogo5caLcYTTFWfeKWPH9DyN/+NkIe0MZ1iW9g=; b=l96tHhmSqtrnE3ct584I8bEaKLsVsA3NJZJIg5ZzcFhlqJUwAzXOtBD0CwsdvB1FE2 iMH8AhZiaOfY8aaBfWgbAbmkpKByhdxsNWYOPs2VBbjdPpKfk2rEKjfXRZcy2ZfFakyS On5i62d83a/akMGRPldEBCV3trwBcM3v4CAjIwTOGTCSfydEy+asD8HqIPOw+BRRxPXV FxtjDNKjjjgSktqGeO1K5d8BclEQ7Zkc3n7dHqYTJuFQuZBFkX3hio7GTne90+tuAY49 SthZzMMmbuOmb10LumOC471oYNV4YVG1MeHs2jT4sL7IPcB/sYZKZrVZpofpWeRz/qQ0 oWWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=VE3OMg+Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j191-20020a6380c8000000b00578e153c979si25194635pgd.740.2023.10.01.12.02.02 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Oct 2023 12:02:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=VE3OMg+Z; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD914807C640; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 12:00:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S235310AbjJATAg (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:36 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36588 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229505AbjJATAg (ORCPT ); Sun, 1 Oct 2023 15:00:36 -0400 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91436D3 for ; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 12:00:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2015AC433C7; Sun, 1 Oct 2023 19:00:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1696186833; bh=eyERj5WSKcvnTl8jgW5kdCQQLtX0BPFCZgQLqomhC7g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=VE3OMg+ZERwDJW+h0DpZSw8vZfHcqn2A4nLRIibtTJFDmeHLgVY/6X0ft6wUYNOuV VYL6VgPlVx3CjnborcbvzdQGs6t3R6ZNgz5yybE/wy+dAV810RsQPi+Z8Lip1YtKC/ d1212UCgQDvvFLR4AtJh6wTLq34aF90QO4Quh2HX0ch5aJ7DMBU6k45KA/hrrcy6el IlWxaXtE7jZuiq4gIHHVqS3oo37tfhiJjGJcL6uZ4G+TxpbT9VOxSohsSJ640yTKD9 X8xWyjbpmCiUNhutDoeT1FZDO50j0Opuf2gZrXWZVfJXfAinkGeENNG2Y5cYpFnwBI fPAu7SdSEQsTg== Date: Sun, 1 Oct 2023 21:59:34 +0300 From: Mike Rapoport To: Yajun Deng Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, mike.kravetz@oracle.com, muchun.song@linux.dev, willy@infradead.org, david@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mm: Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when MEMINIT_EARLY Message-ID: <20231001185934.GX3303@kernel.org> References: <20230928083302.386202-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev> <20230928083302.386202-3-yajun.deng@linux.dev> <20230929083018.GU3303@kernel.org> <20230929100252.GW3303@kernel.org> <15233624-f32e-172e-b2f6-7ca7bffbc96d@linux.dev> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15233624-f32e-172e-b2f6-7ca7bffbc96d@linux.dev> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Sun, 01 Oct 2023 12:00:38 -0700 (PDT) On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 06:27:25PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > On 2023/9/29 18:02, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 05:50:40PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > > On 2023/9/29 16:30, Mike Rapoport wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 04:33:02PM +0800, Yajun Deng wrote: > > > > > memmap_init_range() would init page count of all pages, but the free > > > > > pages count would be reset in __free_pages_core(). There are opposite > > > > > operations. It's unnecessary and time-consuming when it's MEMINIT_EARLY > > > > > context. > > > > > > > > > > Init page count in reserve_bootmem_region when in MEMINIT_EARLY context, > > > > > and check the page count before reset it. > > > > > > > > > > At the same time, the INIT_LIST_HEAD in reserve_bootmem_region isn't > > > > > need, as it already done in __init_single_page. > > > > > > > > > > The following data was tested on an x86 machine with 190GB of RAM. > > > > > > > > > > before: > > > > > free_low_memory_core_early() 341ms > > > > > > > > > > after: > > > > > free_low_memory_core_early() 285ms > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Yajun Deng > > > > > --- > > > > > v4: same with v2. > > > > > v3: same with v2. > > > > > v2: check page count instead of check context before reset it. > > > > > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230922070923.355656-1-yajun.deng@linux.dev/ > > > > > --- > > > > > mm/mm_init.c | 18 +++++++++++++----- > > > > > mm/page_alloc.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > > > > > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/mm/mm_init.c b/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > index 9716c8a7ade9..3ab8861e1ef3 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/mm_init.c > > > > > @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ static void __meminit init_reserved_page(unsigned long pfn, int nid) > > > > > if (zone_spans_pfn(zone, pfn)) > > > > > break; > > > > > } > > > > > - __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT); > > > > > + __init_single_page(pfn_to_page(pfn), pfn, zid, nid, 0); > > > > > } > > > > > #else > > > > > static inline void pgdat_set_deferred_range(pg_data_t *pgdat) {} > > > > > @@ -756,8 +756,8 @@ void __meminit reserve_bootmem_region(phys_addr_t start, > > > > > init_reserved_page(start_pfn, nid); > > > > > - /* Avoid false-positive PageTail() */ > > > > > - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru); > > > > > + /* Init page count for reserved region */ > > > > Please add a comment that describes _why_ we initialize the page count here. > > > Okay. > > > > > + init_page_count(page); > > > > > /* > > > > > * no need for atomic set_bit because the struct > > > > > @@ -888,9 +888,17 @@ void __meminit memmap_init_range(unsigned long size, int nid, unsigned long zone > > > > > } > > > > > page = pfn_to_page(pfn); > > > > > - __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT); > > > > > - if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > > > > + > > > > > + /* If the context is MEMINIT_EARLY, we will init page count and > > > > > + * mark page reserved in reserve_bootmem_region, the free region > > > > > + * wouldn't have page count and we will check the pages count > > > > > + * in __free_pages_core. > > > > > + */ > > > > > + __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, 0); > > > > > + if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) { > > > > > + init_page_count(page); > > > > > __SetPageReserved(page); > > > > Rather than calling init_page_count() and __SetPageReserved() for > > > > MEMINIT_HOTPLUG you can set flags to INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED > > > > an call __init_single_page() after the check for MEMINIT_HOTPLUG. > > > No, the following code would cost more time than the current code in > > > memmap_init(). > > > > > > if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > > > > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED); > > > else > > > > > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, 0); > > Sorry if I wasn't clear. What I meant was to have something along these lines: > > > > enum page_init_flags flags = 0; > > > > if (context == MEMINIT_HOTPLUG) > > flags = INIT_PAGE_COUNT | INIT_PAGE_RESERVED; > > __init_single_page(page, pfn, zone, nid, flags); > > > Okay, I'll test the time consumed in memmap_init(). > > > > But more generally, I wonder if we have to differentiate HOTPLUG here at all. > > > > @David, can you comment please? > > > > > > > > > + } > > > > > /* > > > > > * Usually, we want to mark the pageblock MIGRATE_MOVABLE, > > > > > diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > index 06be8821d833..b868caabe8dc 100644 > > > > > --- a/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c > > > > > @@ -1285,18 +1285,22 @@ void __free_pages_core(struct page *page, unsigned int order) > > > > > unsigned int loop; > > > > > /* > > > > > - * When initializing the memmap, __init_single_page() sets the refcount > > > > > - * of all pages to 1 ("allocated"/"not free"). We have to set the > > > > > - * refcount of all involved pages to 0. > > > > > + * When initializing the memmap, memmap_init_range sets the refcount > > > > > + * of all pages to 1 ("reserved" and "free") in hotplug context. We > > > > > + * have to set the refcount of all involved pages to 0. Otherwise, > > > > > + * we don't do it, as reserve_bootmem_region only set the refcount on > > > > > + * reserve region ("reserved") in early context. > > > > > */ > > > > Again, why hotplug and early init should be different? > > > I will add a comment that describes it will save boot time. > > But why do we need initialize struct pages differently at boot time vs > > memory hotplug? > > Is there a reason memory hotplug cannot have page count set to 0 just like > > for pages reserved at boot time? > > This patch just save boot time in MEMINIT_EARLY. If someone finds out that > it can save time in > > MEMINIT_HOTPLUG, I think it can be done in another patch later. I just > keeping it in the same. But it's not the same. It becomes slower after your patch and the code that frees the pages for MEMINIT_EARLY and MEMINIT_HOTPLUG becomes non-uniform for no apparent reason. The if (page_count(page)) is really non-obvious... > > > > > - prefetchw(p); > > > > > - for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) { > > > > > - prefetchw(p + 1); > > > > > + if (page_count(page)) { > > > > > + prefetchw(p); > > > > > + for (loop = 0; loop < (nr_pages - 1); loop++, p++) { > > > > > + prefetchw(p + 1); > > > > > + __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > + set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > + } > > > > > __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > } > > > > > - __ClearPageReserved(p); > > > > > - set_page_count(p, 0); > > > > > atomic_long_add(nr_pages, &page_zone(page)->managed_pages); > > > > > -- > > > > > 2.25.1 > > > > > -- Sincerely yours, Mike.