Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762584AbXKMV60 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:58:26 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759425AbXKMV6N (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:58:13 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:43965 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755135AbXKMV6K convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:58:10 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 13:56:58 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: =?ISO-8859-1?B?SvZybg==?= Engel Cc: Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, David Miller Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Message-Id: <20071113135658.5c9ac7ba.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20071113213358.GC20167@lazybastard.org> References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113034916.2556edd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.035824.40509981.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113041259.79c9a8c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113134029.GA30978@elte.hu> <4739AFE0.20705@rtr.ca> <20071113193750.GD1356@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <473A067F.3090007@rtr.ca> <20071113213358.GC20167@lazybastard.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1771 Lines: 36 On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:33:58 +0100 J?rn Engel wrote: > On Tue, 13 November 2007 15:18:07 -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > > > > I just find it weird that something can be known broken for several -rc* > > kernels before I happen to install it, discover it's broken on my own > > machine, > > and then I track it down, fix it, and submit the patch, generally all > > within a > > couple of hours. Where the heck was the dude(ess) that broke it ?? AWOL. > > > > And when I receive hostility from the "maintainers" of said code for fixing > > their bugs, well.. that really motivates me to continue reporting new ones.. > > Given a decent bug report, I agree that having the bug not looked at is > shameful. But what can a developer do if a bug report effectively reads > "there is some bug somewhere in recent kernels"? How can I know that in > this particular case it is my bug that I introduced? It could just as > easily be 50 other people and none of them are eager to debug it unless > they suspect it to be their bug. It's relatively common that a regression in subsystem A will manifest as a failure in subsystem B, and the report initially lands on the desk of the subsystem B developers. But that's OK. The subsystem B people are the ones with the expertise to be able to work out where the bug resides and to help the subsystem A people understand what went wrong. Alas, sometimes the B people will just roll eyes and do nothing because they know the problem wasn't in their code. Sometimes. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/