Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3784:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id jk4csp1329573rdb; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 06:32:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGEffDS2wccgLXOxFAN+bw8VzZzHE17oU5o/Bju1ZNaXVOWURPActYOUerznI7EesqfUWwt X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:914e:b0:154:c836:9ed5 with SMTP id x14-20020a056a20914e00b00154c8369ed5mr14610897pzc.17.1696253560973; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1696253560; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VbFJmbInyU3TIh0l7bgYlS2FQ+aAGXev4w+WG+zDSJ8YtkRHqEpMRFEDaCk2FV5GO/ lqgLz7DfXu8aMvAI3O1StqhnZdZcf2JtkWqf1SDgdMsUM2KcBZag+Wj42FNQ/LY7Lc/h KSXDUli3HEJO2u4vzJ3GYm99E3Mh3XXijEpFp6eSYOz8mpjACKHb8+4OkMNZth64f7rP iij/J295X2FVaIsNCXLJZrqIwLodUJ3K7DaEjD5dEuAQwTnLubcHtMRlnzZD9bGJ88sb byKAinthUdL886t4CW5BD1YBblRC6K8e4Sko2WMcUDvUifLOTWe0r/Yk/DKrqqZDxGcH SOcg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:subject:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=0zfNZlxXcCTfNfmsz4BOltE66rgV2iaZsNlV7GrJxxA=; fh=4lN4E9827fGYwa6vjzoE+jRMn55X5nnh/n8g5iW7XVM=; b=C1cDtHn8F4Lh+WN/iHrMpc/QhJF6RGtHd02gdSyHKjcJwma1J/raqYFpJi6s7+8T34 USlzLta+FGXF2i/RBobHmSVDK6TC5ts3p0VGDs/nYv0N/f1YjkdI0Ofe5a0/0OrSLLI2 NRK7w88k/EqsNtKU0oWkZn7e3JnZTjDeOO/iF7rdn3Zx2EWun5cQhQ8Z1IR+jGv561P8 AVijWwjggt7ETjmCD70feaDPojZhkZ2JHs0S/zo+NZpREoh1//3jGmxxlFg07Q/rrs1c F+PwbK3fPT5vPobkVqazYbpVeHlTNDfbBd3mpILHKfNUnhnONoHq5CVuwqYjMsGNlxBa Fs/A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PUSHbJzy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from snail.vger.email (snail.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::3:7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z35-20020a056a001da300b00690f9e835d8si26138359pfw.132.2023.10.02.06.32.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 06:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:7; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=PUSHbJzy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:7 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by snail.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B1A801C09B; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 02:24:05 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at snail.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236097AbjJBJYA (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 05:24:00 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:50574 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236076AbjJBJXw (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 05:23:52 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x32e.google.com (mail-wm1-x32e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFDA991; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 02:23:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x32e.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4060b623e64so17034395e9.0; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:23:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1696238627; x=1696843427; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=0zfNZlxXcCTfNfmsz4BOltE66rgV2iaZsNlV7GrJxxA=; b=PUSHbJzyijUr1rpI8epmHVk+nCxLKUH1kzecaZs0XqrrYH6uG9pLmocoFRMqOtQ3D3 IXX8Dg+WyQ2OZTMe5gxIbFYprbKuMgBNGLtcaRlkrcVqdEZOg7PcfQ8SzgUSKrpvPV2g MbOXnFm9WSaFziC2IIzprhMEEnyCUURmraR3mqS0HTZfUTOyXXjMPHW6gS5FXOtDmWxS Srdu8j/1acXUS8MCfgf11gG5cGuf5QFQJ7x1D4GxSDIOm1kpCupxFWV53oCNdr1IrT6q BGVX5DMOVpNbNN36ICNFUgh2II3dErmikrxnaNAevAFGGX/HHaBbLM3dxC4V0YUp4mVE 2I6g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696238627; x=1696843427; h=cc:to:in-reply-to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:subject:date:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=0zfNZlxXcCTfNfmsz4BOltE66rgV2iaZsNlV7GrJxxA=; b=ZPj0cXgipgDPTcACLEWbNrw5HRed16snHb3/7f8O93HA3mU4TSko732Bseg409icUO tZfsejGZMWUX7EDYqCvsMcAcRlUS8sSiV4dDD4JoqctsuT6zfxhQEm690QYNPbpfhzFy c1+nxp5N3OtQgutGOdG89uutjQU8xCd7V0L0kvEBwVvVmhyqQPYsQWc8hySS7ej3AoHz vdigSHuGHQKAGDmKko5MP8xC+egyFMx04pOrxr8CKcvvW0yimvkx+vQIlzWbb7wXAhzo gfQrXYsjvmm7jP2zIIXAPLntWS5QpLGJEqa631cVEI+mh+YIxhHRGxixWWM/pBzZGPqP d0AQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx1gfVSx/txVBRLBfwbtAYrL3poX2jwHPkqXDSZGFz4PTrQ+Goq xeQQNfdZNjSRqqy9TIHwLnqTurm1Pgw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:5022:b0:405:3f06:d2ef with SMTP id n34-20020a05600c502200b004053f06d2efmr9149200wmr.4.1696238626910; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.1.1] ([91.230.2.244]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o30-20020a05600c511e00b003fef5e76f2csm6156589wms.0.2023.10.02.02.23.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:23:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Benjamin Bara Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2023 11:23:32 +0200 Subject: [PATCH RFC 1/4] clk: only set req_rate if it is set by consumer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20231002-ccf-set-multiple-v1-1-2df5e9eb3738@skidata.com> References: <20231002-ccf-set-multiple-v1-0-2df5e9eb3738@skidata.com> In-Reply-To: <20231002-ccf-set-multiple-v1-0-2df5e9eb3738@skidata.com> To: Maxime Ripard , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd Cc: Frank Oltmanns , Adam Ford , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Benjamin Bara X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (snail.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 02:24:05 -0700 (PDT) From: Benjamin Bara Currently, the req_rate is set during initialization and during re-parenting. Therefore, it is not clear whether the req_rate is really required by a consumer or just set by accident. Fix this by only setting the req_rate when it is really required (clk_set_rate() is called by consumer). Signed-off-by: Benjamin Bara --- drivers/clk/clk.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c index c249f9791ae8..82f954121e4d 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ #include "clk.h" +#define CLK_RATE_UNSET -1UL + static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(enable_lock); static DEFINE_MUTEX(prepare_lock); @@ -1832,7 +1834,6 @@ static unsigned long clk_recalc(struct clk_core *core, /** * __clk_recalc_rates * @core: first clk in the subtree - * @update_req: Whether req_rate should be updated with the new rate * @msg: notification type (see include/linux/clk.h) * * Walks the subtree of clks starting with clk and recalculates rates as it @@ -1842,8 +1843,7 @@ static unsigned long clk_recalc(struct clk_core *core, * clk_recalc_rates also propagates the POST_RATE_CHANGE notification, * if necessary. */ -static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, bool update_req, - unsigned long msg) +static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, unsigned long msg) { unsigned long old_rate; unsigned long parent_rate = 0; @@ -1857,8 +1857,6 @@ static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, bool update_req, parent_rate = core->parent->rate; core->rate = clk_recalc(core, parent_rate); - if (update_req) - core->req_rate = core->rate; /* * ignore NOTIFY_STOP and NOTIFY_BAD return values for POST_RATE_CHANGE @@ -1868,13 +1866,13 @@ static void __clk_recalc_rates(struct clk_core *core, bool update_req, __clk_notify(core, msg, old_rate, core->rate); hlist_for_each_entry(child, &core->children, child_node) - __clk_recalc_rates(child, update_req, msg); + __clk_recalc_rates(child, msg); } static unsigned long clk_core_get_rate_recalc(struct clk_core *core) { if (core && (core->flags & CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE)) - __clk_recalc_rates(core, false, 0); + __clk_recalc_rates(core, 0); return clk_core_get_rate_nolock(core); } @@ -2455,7 +2453,6 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core, /* change the rates */ clk_change_rate(top); - core->req_rate = req_rate; err: clk_pm_runtime_put(core); @@ -2485,6 +2482,7 @@ static int clk_core_set_rate_nolock(struct clk_core *core, */ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) { + unsigned long old_req_rate; int ret; if (!clk) @@ -2493,6 +2491,9 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) /* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */ clk_prepare_lock(); + old_req_rate = clk->core->req_rate; + clk->core->req_rate = rate; + if (clk->exclusive_count) clk_core_rate_unprotect(clk->core); @@ -2501,6 +2502,9 @@ int clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) if (clk->exclusive_count) clk_core_rate_protect(clk->core); + if (ret) + clk->core->req_rate = old_req_rate; + clk_prepare_unlock(); return ret; @@ -2528,6 +2532,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_set_rate); */ int clk_set_rate_exclusive(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) { + unsigned long old_req_rate; int ret; if (!clk) @@ -2536,6 +2541,9 @@ int clk_set_rate_exclusive(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) /* prevent racing with updates to the clock topology */ clk_prepare_lock(); + old_req_rate = clk->core->req_rate; + clk->core->req_rate = rate; + /* * The temporary protection removal is not here, on purpose * This function is meant to be used instead of clk_rate_protect, @@ -2546,6 +2554,8 @@ int clk_set_rate_exclusive(struct clk *clk, unsigned long rate) if (!ret) { clk_core_rate_protect(clk->core); clk->exclusive_count++; + } else { + clk->core->req_rate = old_req_rate; } clk_prepare_unlock(); @@ -2723,7 +2733,7 @@ static void clk_core_reparent(struct clk_core *core, { clk_reparent(core, new_parent); __clk_recalc_accuracies(core); - __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, POST_RATE_CHANGE); + __clk_recalc_rates(core, POST_RATE_CHANGE); } void clk_hw_reparent(struct clk_hw *hw, struct clk_hw *new_parent) @@ -2807,9 +2817,9 @@ static int clk_core_set_parent_nolock(struct clk_core *core, /* propagate rate an accuracy recalculation accordingly */ if (ret) { - __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, ABORT_RATE_CHANGE); + __clk_recalc_rates(core, ABORT_RATE_CHANGE); } else { - __clk_recalc_rates(core, true, POST_RATE_CHANGE); + __clk_recalc_rates(core, POST_RATE_CHANGE); __clk_recalc_accuracies(core); } @@ -3706,7 +3716,7 @@ static void clk_core_reparent_orphans_nolock(void) __clk_set_parent_before(orphan, parent); __clk_set_parent_after(orphan, parent, NULL); __clk_recalc_accuracies(orphan); - __clk_recalc_rates(orphan, true, 0); + __clk_recalc_rates(orphan, 0); /* * __clk_init_parent() will set the initial req_rate to @@ -3888,7 +3898,8 @@ static int __clk_core_init(struct clk_core *core) rate = parent->rate; else rate = 0; - core->rate = core->req_rate = rate; + core->rate = rate; + core->req_rate = CLK_RATE_UNSET; /* * Enable CLK_IS_CRITICAL clocks so newly added critical clocks -- 2.34.1