Received: by 2002:a05:7412:3784:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id jk4csp1490011rdb; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IF4DNbKly7Izd64KdoEDAe+bqiNI9JddGK74F4jBsWSWhzmSQavcDpdGdze9/b+2/UV1j07 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a20:100c:b0:163:b85e:631a with SMTP id gs12-20020a056a20100c00b00163b85e631amr5027822pzc.39.1696269829452; Mon, 02 Oct 2023 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1696269829; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=pt17Ckljiz5Ad0VSbCsB1ZualqkNoVDDnE3uBqBE/3JgBgRPuwK6U5XbRpzETZ/gh4 KUjRe/EPQ3v0Lmj6W6BOhmB1wqsXZAoivdZiHcakurcoMVkdYE4GExQmim0Z+no+Ynl5 rxaentWHqRjYXCmnHnGZCnESi/iS16FklKtdznJ82pcqCwXEjcYV4sSNGFno02WWjc/V UhthRCAd1muCX09knHM/8o6hlf1+UoZXMtYI7vQjNtghK4f8tHxhkThh0/GZTsBdLUA1 vhFx97d2NSBgRYiW+ZXR1vrx7zm8r1iWbPW9/HIXfWrq8qaVKhOZMBnItok8y8b9dg5j UOOQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:references:message-id:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=s0G5rE4zDV8S3yUxunaSFalECVvFQC5AdaL6ZRrvRxg=; fh=ZJn6Q77Dr4tCBRWQ87km+1NOLaKwnwtcfV8QdEr5aLg=; b=fVH2cRBjveaSSILGs79+Gepw7VPtahRHVgVC2YHQHsOhL5XdIhNTW55vn0RExasRjo Id4qxxLfa+MBH1MO4iMnbw6aWyryCp/4PeMR9Xs90DDiuER/EJY3uCal0KdE46oehxnQ y9ntPPmp2UenKWLFhg3RK7PutwiH7fttH9AnPIUhSo8p7Dqhho4fHUxalS1axWEIWp4v DqF/Vw1mYYy29fAdb/glodTBVSFiPbZD/tyOdVmkBdJnjjy9r7vkvLZdGzQ0DYpEIr16 rfter+8xsEHzFJ8C2IKa4rVgViAmZh40Ah5rGUr+B5mHki0so1TJ9l11i+rgn36xlryk RS3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=SGfOxKMj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Return-Path: Received: from lipwig.vger.email (lipwig.vger.email. [23.128.96.33]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l16-20020a170903121000b001c62e465391si5523584plh.147.2023.10.02.11.03.38 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 11:03:49 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@intel.com header.s=Intel header.b=SGfOxKMj; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=intel.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by lipwig.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31629807C652; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at lipwig.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236730AbjJBLu0 (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:50:26 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:49106 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236786AbjJBLb0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Oct 2023 07:31:26 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.115]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA33CD8; Mon, 2 Oct 2023 04:31:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1696246283; x=1727782283; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:message-id: references:mime-version; bh=aCTNRtcJs2aRsXatRFnEc0X1XOXxvpcVCPYjfzR4Hds=; b=SGfOxKMjrYXZUJCXWbRioYOHY2UcBPNkQo1uMwBJn/7mY3zZzSnUDhmb BM+RvCQGRAx5yd7+w4TZcFP+gmus8VtBqXBJPDHllK9o4hx88S9tz9rEC QA6yrsf0OGIMmFibve9L+uu4kuV+B6NuitUUfICzurf52eNn43SzMx7ll XW8JVVepxZuYgC+tu36PLiCm6cuN3zg31ELIrQO3lRWmot5mKjiPwbX+W 0tKrEvvYsH5/4JoE7YV1wHfrygTgxmkqtnweicbpgFsDUARfnOUiPl5mU 6VWi8FVorCaeSSpc1f5OzicxZspfJbVSn0Hb+NovmonH+brMj966jWvkO Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10850"; a="382529557" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,194,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="382529557" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by fmsmga103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2023 04:31:22 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10850"; a="866474806" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,194,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="866474806" Received: from roliveir-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.251.222.16]) by fmsmga002-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2023 04:31:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2023 14:31:18 +0300 (EEST) From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Ilpo_J=E4rvinen?= To: Shuah Khan cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Reinette Chatre , =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Maciej_Wiecz=F3r-Retman?= , Shaopeng Tan , LKML , stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] selftests/resctrl: Fixes to failing tests In-Reply-To: <20231002094813.6633-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> Message-ID: <6a826da8-a94d-261b-cfe8-c494d7237a0@linux.intel.com> References: <20231002094813.6633-1-ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lipwig.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (lipwig.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 02 Oct 2023 04:50:39 -0700 (PDT) This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Mon, 2 Oct 2023, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: > Fix four issues with resctrl selftests. > > The signal handling fix became necessary after the mount/umount fixes > and the uninitialized member bug was discovered during the review. > > The other two came up when I ran resctrl selftests across the server > fleet in our lab to validate the upcoming CAT test rewrite (the rewrite > is not part of this series). > > These are developed and should apply cleanly at least on top the > benchmark cleanup series (might apply cleanly also w/o the benchmark > series, I didn't test). LKP seems to no longer happy to apply this cleanly without the benchmark rework series as the signal handling fix got now a bigger footprint (maybe LKP didn't build v3 at all as the changes from v3->v4 were really small and I did not get error out of v3). Shuah, would you want me to reorganize this such that it goes in before the benchmark series? In any case, I'll wait until Reinette has had time to look at the first patch if I'm to send the series reordered. -- i. --8323329-198948541-1696246282=:2459--