Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35;
Message-ID: <74725381-bb13-2550-efd3-224e51af49d2@quicinc.com>
Date:   Mon, 2 Oct 2023 10:31:27 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.10.0
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support
To:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
        Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>
CC:     "cristian.marussi@arm.com" <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        "andersson@kernel.org" <andersson@kernel.org>,
        "konrad.dybcio@linaro.org" <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
References: <20230718160833.36397-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <20230911194359.27547-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <0efe305e-031b-bdf5-0268-ca1c6d562653@quicinc.com>
 <20230918151552.n3jvw2qqi5tmyfbb@bogus> <ZQhysWhFtR68iVMa@brian-x1>
 <20230919085612.gdmpze6c6stvammg@bogus>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
In-Reply-To: <20230919085612.gdmpze6c6stvammg@bogus>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk


On 9/19/2023 1:56 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:01:26AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
>>>> Gentle Ping!
>>>>
>>> I will take a look at this later this week. That said, I am unable be
>>> gauge the urgency based on you ping here. You have shown the same urgency
>>> last time for a feature that I queued promptly just to know that it was
>>> abandon within couple of days. So I don't want to rush here simply based
>>> on the number of pings here. I need to understand that it is really that
>>> important. For now, I am thinking of skipping even v6.7 just to allow
>>> some time for Qcom to make up its mind and be absolutely sure this is what
>>> they *really* want this time.
>> Hi Sudeep,
>>
>> Red Hat is interested in this patch set. Qualcomm is moving one of their
>> automotive platforms over to use SCMI and this will appear in that
>> product.
>>
> Thanks Brian, I trust Redhat over Qcom ????. I will try to review and enable
> progress later this week. We can try to target next merge window.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Gentle Ping...