Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762874AbXKNAkJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:40:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1759993AbXKNAjy (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:39:54 -0500 Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243]:35711 "EHLO an-out-0708.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759740AbXKNAjx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:39:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=LQEoBq6M0zFD8FvxPNbEBnfa274tnJoXH9snXYq1kJIPQR6gO5177wLXZYaJE+amcaCSg2lMp44bPWi7pjNDM6TtqRta+Qh09lERCmHmJFohj5HGAxrnFN1FH+pN3Rgh7rFUTL9vxYIh35wQRnxcrNCmoFz2N6G/iifIneVWzS4= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Adrian Bunk Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:39:45 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Theodore Tso , Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Miller , protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113171356.GA25824@thunk.org> <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711131739.45820.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1776 Lines: 40 On Tuesday 13 November 2007 10:56, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote: > > > Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros > > > (gentoo->ubuntu) > > > and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I > > > know this isn't a lkml problem > > > but more a distro problem, but I would love having an ubuntu blessed > > > repo with current dev kernel > > > for the latest stable ubuntu release). > > > > There are two parts to this. One is a Ubuntu development kernel which > > we can give to large numbers of people to expand our testing pool. > > But if we don't do a better job of responding to bug reports that > > would be generated by expanded testing this won't necessarily help us. > >... > > The main problem aren't missing testers [1] - we already have relatively > experienced people testing kernels and/or reporting bugs, and we slowly > scare them away due to the many bug reports without any reaction. > > The main problem is finding experienced developers who spend time on > looking into bug reports. > > Getting many relatively unexperienced users (who need more guidance for > debugging issues) as additional testers is therefore IMHO not > necessarily a good idea. And where experienced developrs are coming from? They are not born with Linux kernel skills. They grow up from within user base. Bigger user base -> more developers (eventually) -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/