Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762864AbXKNAlp (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:41:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1760911AbXKNAle (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:41:34 -0500 Received: from py-out-1112.google.com ([64.233.166.176]:18996 "EHLO py-out-1112.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760438AbXKNAlc (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 19:41:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=VpzE6nviNwi4KRPBmtaAAQerIhmP7dPR3ZKU9SBMKMGXUgI9Um6snJIDqebIfJJEXY87rRW83giXWq9DLCa5Q6w8GG+R742y+avFLBvsDuAZNuBNP9xshrx+SjsKvJc2w5dhHtfGJGhN4WW+hQ0A0g22BOHbPhWDncwvGkCz4io= From: Denys Vlasenko To: Gabriel C Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:41:06 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Adrian Bunk , Theodore Tso , Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Miller , protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> <4739F399.2010605@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: <4739F399.2010605@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711131741.06509.vda.linux@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 941 Lines: 22 On Tuesday 13 November 2007 11:57, Gabriel C wrote: > > The main problem is finding experienced developers who spend time on > > looking into bug reports. > > There are already. IMO the problem is the development model. > > There are tons new features in each new kernel release and 'tons new bugs' > which are not fixed during the release cycle nor in the .XX stable kernels. > > Maybe after XX kernel releases there should be one just with bug-fixes > _without_ any new features , eg: cleaning bugs from bugzilla , know > regressions , cleaning up code , removing broken drivers and the like. Won't work. You cannot force people to work on things they don't find interesting, long-term. -- vda - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/