Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762171AbXKNBLa (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761011AbXKNBLU (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:20 -0500 Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:59545 "EHLO smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1764137AbXKNBLT (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:11:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 17:11:13 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Kevin Winchester Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: mm snapshot broken-out-2007-11-13-04-14.tar.gz uploaded Message-Id: <20071113171113.06f2b26f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <200711132020.33124.kjwinchester@gmail.com> References: <200711131215.lADCFfht009739@imap1.linux-foundation.org> <200711132020.33124.kjwinchester@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.1 (GTK+ 2.8.17; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2215 Lines: 57 On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:20:32 -0400 Kevin Winchester wrote: > On November 13, 2007 08:15:41 am akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: > > The mm snapshot broken-out-2007-11-13-04-14.tar.gz has been uploaded to > > > > > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/mm/broken-out-2007-11-13- > >04-14.tar.gz > > > > It contains the following patches against 2.6.24-rc2: > > > > > > How exactly do I go about trying out this snapshot? I did the following: > > - exported 2.6.24-rc2 from my cloned git tree to a separate folder > - installed quilt > - extracted the patches to the "patches" directory at the top level of the > 2.6.24-rc2 tree > - copied the list of patches from your mail into a "series" file which I > placed in the "patches" directory The tarball contains a copy of the series file. For some reason LARGE numbers of people miss it and ask me "hey, where's the series file?". Odd. > - ran "quilt push -a" > > The result was that all of the patches seem to have been applied, but there > were many offsets and at least one fuzzed patch. Should they have applied > cleanly? Is quilt the way I am supposed to be applying these patches? Yes, the -mm patches contain large amount of fuzz. I'll occasionally go in and do a mass defuzzing (shaving?) but it all goes fuzzy again within a day. I _could_ rediff all the time, but I keep all the patches under revision control and I often need to grab the previous version of a patch (when I've just dropped an earlier patch, and that earlier patch had caused me to redo this patch). Having lots of revisions due to unnecessary rediffing would complicate that. > Is > there a reason that there is no "series" file in the archive with the > patches? It's in there ;) btw, I put the patches in a directory called "broken-out" so that you can untar them in your kernel tree and not have them stomped all over your existing patches/ directory. symlink it... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/