Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.32 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.32;
Message-ID: <8a506cfa-7274-b760-1fc1-60d0e5b75a8b@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 08:55:08 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.15.1
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] ASoC: Intel: Skylake: Move snd_hdac_i915_init to
 before probe_work.
To:     Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
        Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>,
        Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <liam.r.girdwood@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
        Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
        Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org
References: <20230929145123.233838-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
 <20231002165202.17863-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From:   =?UTF-8?Q?Amadeusz_S=c5=82awi=c5=84ski?= 
        <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231002165202.17863-1-maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On 10/2/2023 6:52 PM, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
> Now that we can use -EPROBE_DEFER, it's no longer required to spin off
> the snd_hdac_i915_init into a workqueue. It's likely the whole workqueue
> can be destroyed, but I don't have the means to test this.
> 
> Removing the workqueue would simplify init even further, but is left
> as exercise for the reviewer.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński <amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com>
> ---

Isn't the convention that your Signed-off should be last when you are 
sending the patches? Or does it only apply to Signed-off lines 
themselves and other lines can be anywhere?