Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 12:01:32 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
Cc:     linus.walleij@linaro.org, mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com,
        linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@intel.com, bala.senthil@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: baytrail: drop runtime PM support
Message-ID: <ZRvYbFF0h7OOo7Nu@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20231003081519.27524-1-raag.jadav@intel.com>
 <ZRvX9GUXbJksmSIP@smile.fi.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZRvX9GUXbJksmSIP@smile.fi.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 11:59:33AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 01:45:18PM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > Since Baytrail pinctrl device is not attached to acpi_lpss_pm_domain,
> > runtime PM serves no purpose here. Drop it and switch to pm_sleep_ptr()
> > as now we only have suspend and resume handles in place.
> > 
> > No functional impact.
> 
> > TODO:
> > Consider moving to DEFINE_LATE_DEV_PM_OPS() in the future once we have
> > enough users to account for its introduction.
> 
> This is not related to the commit message.
> I'll drop it.

Ah, and next time, please do a cover letter for the series, it can be
better managed from maintainer perspective.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko