Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:4 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:4;
From:   Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
To:     linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     gjoyce@linux.vnet.ibm.com, jonathan.derrick@linux.dev,
        axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>,
        Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] block: Fix regression in sed-opal for a saved key.
Date:   Tue,  3 Oct 2023 12:02:09 +0200
Message-ID: <20231003100209.380037-1-gmazyland@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

The commit 3bfeb61256643281ac4be5b8a57e9d9da3db4335
introduced the use of keyring for sed-opal.

Unfortunately, there is also a possibility to save
the Opal key used in opal_lock_unlock().

This patch switches the order of operation, so the cached
key is used instead of failure for opal_get_key.

The problem was found by the cryptsetup Opal test recently
added to the cryptsetup tree.

Fixes: 3bfeb6125664 ("block: sed-opal: keyring support for SED keys")
Tested-by: Ondrej Kozina <okozina@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Milan Broz <gmazyland@gmail.com>
---
 block/sed-opal.c | 7 +++----
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/sed-opal.c b/block/sed-opal.c
index 6d7f25d1711b..04f38a3f5d95 100644
--- a/block/sed-opal.c
+++ b/block/sed-opal.c
@@ -2888,12 +2888,11 @@ static int opal_lock_unlock(struct opal_dev *dev,
 	if (lk_unlk->session.who > OPAL_USER9)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	ret = opal_get_key(dev, &lk_unlk->session.opal_key);
-	if (ret)
-		return ret;
 	mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock);
 	opal_lock_check_for_saved_key(dev, lk_unlk);
-	ret = __opal_lock_unlock(dev, lk_unlk);
+	ret = opal_get_key(dev, &lk_unlk->session.opal_key);
+	if (!ret)
+		ret = __opal_lock_unlock(dev, lk_unlk);
 	mutex_unlock(&dev->dev_lock);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.42.0