Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 11:34:29 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To:     Nikunj Kela <quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
Cc:     Brian Masney <bmasney@redhat.com>,
        "cristian.marussi@arm.com" <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
        "robh+dt@kernel.org" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
        "conor+dt@kernel.org" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
        "andersson@kernel.org" <andersson@kernel.org>,
        "konrad.dybcio@linaro.org" <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add qcom hvc/shmem transport support
Message-ID: <20231003103429.w52cgafmpmpl4plb@bogus>
References: <20230718160833.36397-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <20230911194359.27547-1-quic_nkela@quicinc.com>
 <0efe305e-031b-bdf5-0268-ca1c6d562653@quicinc.com>
 <20230918151552.n3jvw2qqi5tmyfbb@bogus>
 <ZQhysWhFtR68iVMa@brian-x1>
 <20230919085612.gdmpze6c6stvammg@bogus>
 <74725381-bb13-2550-efd3-224e51af49d2@quicinc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <74725381-bb13-2550-efd3-224e51af49d2@quicinc.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Oct 02, 2023 at 10:31:27AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> 
> On 9/19/2023 1:56 AM, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 11:54:25AM -0400, Brian Masney wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:15:52PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 08:01:26AM -0700, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> > > > > Gentle Ping!
> > > > > 
> > > > I will take a look at this later this week. That said, I am unable be
> > > > gauge the urgency based on you ping here. You have shown the same urgency
> > > > last time for a feature that I queued promptly just to know that it was
> > > > abandon within couple of days. So I don't want to rush here simply based
> > > > on the number of pings here. I need to understand that it is really that
> > > > important. For now, I am thinking of skipping even v6.7 just to allow
> > > > some time for Qcom to make up its mind and be absolutely sure this is what
> > > > they *really* want this time.
> > > Hi Sudeep,
> > > 
> > > Red Hat is interested in this patch set. Qualcomm is moving one of their
> > > automotive platforms over to use SCMI and this will appear in that
> > > product.
> > > 
> > Thanks Brian, I trust Redhat over Qcom ????. I will try to review and enable
> > progress later this week. We can try to target next merge window.
> > 
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
> Gentle Ping...

Sorry for the delay, both me and Cristian looking at this now.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep