Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S283056AbRLWCJH>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:09:07 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S283097AbRLWCI5>; Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:08:57 -0500
Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:7371 "EHLO math.psu.edu")
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S283056AbRLWCIo>;
	Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:08:44 -0500
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2001 21:08:42 -0500 (EST)
From: Alexander Viro <viro@math.psu.edu>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
cc: dcinege@psychosis.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file
In-Reply-To: <3C2534E6.3080806@zytor.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0112222104040.21702-100000@weyl.math.psu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

> Dave Cinege wrote:

[snip]

Umm... Peter, mind forwarding the sensible parts to me?  Sometimes
.procmailrc is a bit too drastic and /dev/null is hard to read...

> Viros changes are drastic, no question about it, but dismissing them as 
> "disaster" without further motivation is a bloody awfully arrogant.

IIRC, his objections back then were about linking archive into the kernel
image.  s/disaster/ugly stuff that was nowhere near top-priority and got fixed
since then/ and I agree with that one.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/