Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:3 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:3;
Feedback-ID: i56a14606:Fastmail
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.9.0-alpha0-958-g1b1b911df8-fm-20230927.002-g1b1b911d
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <e076a52f-8aeb-417a-8093-362d36573f8b@app.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <50f32be6-ccbe-42b7-81bf-7509da400ba6@linaro.org>
References: <20230929102539.42b11f3c@canb.auug.org.au>
 <50f32be6-ccbe-42b7-81bf-7509da400ba6@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:31:19 +0200
From:   "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To:     "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
        "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
        "Olof Johansson" <olof@lixom.net>
Cc:     ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-next <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the samsung-krzk tree
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023, at 08:22, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/09/2023 02:25, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> The following commit is also in the arm-soc-fixes tree as a different
>> commit (but the same patch):
>> 
>>   471eed5ad217 ("arm64: defconfig: enable syscon-poweroff driver")
>> 
>> This is commit
>> 
>>   d75e870c32f6 ("arm64: defconfig: enable syscon-poweroff driver")
>> 
>> in the arm-soc-fixes tree.
>
> Hm, I did not expect this going through arm-soc, but no problem. I
> dropped it now from my tree.

Right, I was a little confused about why you sent the patch to
soc@kernel.org and had to guess between applying to fixes, to
the next branches or ignoring.

I should have asked you for confirmation here, but ended up
just merging it as it seemed harmless enough either way.

     Arnd