Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Date:   Tue, 3 Oct 2023 09:04:43 -0700
From:   Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To:     Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc:     Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
        Qinglin Pan <panqinglin2020@iscas.ac.cn>,
        Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes 0/2] Fix set_huge_pte_at()
Message-Id: <20231003090443.67a2e2692b68211e05b53248@linux-foundation.org>
In-Reply-To: <305b4dec-c99d-3cee-4563-8d7dcbae9384@ghiti.fr>
References: <20230928151846.8229-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
        <305b4dec-c99d-3cee-4563-8d7dcbae9384@ghiti.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 17:43:10 +0200 Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr> wrote:

> +cc Andrew: Would=A0 you mind taking this patchset in your tree for the=20
> next rc? This patchset depends on a previous fix for arm64 that you=20
> merged in rc4 which is not in the riscv -fixes branch yet.
>=20
> I saw with Palmer and he should ack this shortly.

Well I grabbed them into mm.git's mm-hotfixes-unstable queue.  All
being well I'll move them into mm-hotfixes-stable within a week then
into Linus shortly after.

Unless something changes.  It's odd that the riscv tree(s) aren't set
up to merge fixes against -rc4?