Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:2 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:2;
From:   Min-Hua Chen <minhuadotchen@gmail.com>
To:     corbet@lwn.net
Cc:     linux-doc-tw-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        minhuadotchen@gmail.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, src.res@email.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] convert TW translation sparse.txt to RST
Date:   Wed,  4 Oct 2023 07:40:41 +0800
Message-Id: <20231003234041.3929-1-minhuadotchen@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <8734yrekon.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
References: <8734yrekon.fsf@meer.lwn.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

>>   docs: sparse: move TW sparse.txt to TW dev-tools
>>   docs: sparse: convert sparse.txt to RST
>>   docs: sparse: add sparse.rst to toctree
>>
>>  .../translations/zh_TW/dev-tools/index.rst    | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../{sparse.txt =3D> dev-tools/sparse.rst}      |  2 +-
>>  Documentation/translations/zh_TW/index.rst    |  2 +-
>>  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/translations/zh_TW/dev-tools/index.rst
>>  rename Documentation/translations/zh_TW/{sparse.txt =3D> dev-tools/spars=
>e.rst} (99%)
>
>So this series introduces a new warning:
>
>WARNING: Unparseable C cross-reference: 'int'
>Invalid C declaration: Expected identifier in nested name, got keyword: int=
> [error at 3]
>  int
>  ---^
>
>That is ... somewhat unhelpful.  I eventually tracked it down to this
>piece in sparse.rst:
>
>> =E6=89=80=E4=BB=A5=E6=9B=B4=E7=B0=A1=E5=96=AE=E7=9A=84=E8=BE=A6=E6=B3=95=
>=E5=8F=AA=E8=A6=81=E9=80=99=E6=A8=A3=E5=81=9A=EF=BC=9A
>>=20
>> 	typedef int __bitwise pm_request_t;
>>=20
>> 	#define PM_SUSPEND ((__force pm_request_t) 1)
>> 	#define PM_RESUME ((__force pm_request_t) 2)
>>=20
>> =E7=8F=BE=E5=9C=A8=E4=BD=A0=E5=B0=B1=E6=9C=89=E4=BA=86=E5=9A=B4=E6=A0=BC=
>=E7=9A=84=E9=A1=9E=E5=9E=8B=E6=AA=A2=E6=9F=A5=E6=89=80=E9=9C=80=E8=A6=81=E7=
>=9A=84=E6=89=80=E6=9C=89=E5=9F=BA=E7=A4=8E=E6=9E=B6=E6=A7=8B=E3=80=82
>
>That needs to be a literal block to be parsed properly.  I have taken
>the liberty of changing the first line above to:
>
>> =E6=89=80=E4=BB=A5=E6=9B=B4=E7=B0=A1=E5=96=AE=E7=9A=84=E8=BE=A6=E6=B3=95=
>=E5=8F=AA=E8=A6=81=E9=80=99=E6=A8=A3=E5=81=9A::
>
>...and the warning is gone.
>
>Thus: series applied, but please properly build-test changes like this
>in the future.
>
>Thanks,
>
>jon

Got it, thank you for doing this.
I will do build-test with care in the future.

Min-Hua