Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.34 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.34;
From:   =?utf-8?B?QmrDtnJuIFTDtnBlbA==?= <bjorn@kernel.org>
To:     Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
        Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -fixes] riscv: Fix ftrace syscall handling which are now
 prefixed with __riscv_
In-Reply-To: <CAHVXubgTkoWYEybsbXVbCMO4JaMAChaSq4BgqZZO9ih7OxwUyA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20231003182407.32198-1-alexghiti@rivosinc.com>
 <CAHVXubgTkoWYEybsbXVbCMO4JaMAChaSq4BgqZZO9ih7OxwUyA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 04 Oct 2023 07:51:08 +0200
Message-ID: <87v8bn3pgz.fsf@all.your.base.are.belong.to.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Alexandre Ghiti <alexghiti@rivosinc.com> writes:

> @Conor Dooley This fails checkpatch but the documentation here states
> that this is how to do:
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/Documentation/trace/ftrace-design.rst#L246

FWIW, I'll relax the PW CI checkpatch test going forward. It's way too
strict...