Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20231001131620.112484-1-ubizjak@gmail.com> <CAHk-=wg6P8pPg-x4BPUQj-wE0xC7HkGzFk89ftuji8MVo+RRxw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFULd4Y+HXuditB51Q0LznqiBsvxJr3BjEYvx4_224XmqrycCw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHk-=wh+cfn58XxMLnG6dH+Eb9-2dYfABXJF2FtSZ+vfqVvWzA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFULd4atO8uy_5PbjV8vw-yk0tv_=4kh_JwJ+6Xq-2myStCnmw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAFULd4YsPnCfw-NV_0ck1_za=WPc-FxYKV1bb99UcAwMJ=34YA@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZRrECdIoKCXALl39@gmail.com> <CAFULd4bBzAWoY7MDQN+YV5tpw7vDitFNMuSVt53KGofdZRvTpg@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZRwZOtANkcwtL+5B@gmail.com> <CAHk-=wi2d159z-KgZTAk52GZHB8=B-HZ-fQ_890fN7CL6Yt89g@mail.gmail.com>
 <ZRxu9+ZJqjY/u8ku@gmail.com> <CAHk-=wg5kiiJ+LUChmw73mmi-=uyQrAO-fBTG6yr2ON_UnAoPg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wg5kiiJ+LUChmw73mmi-=uyQrAO-fBTG6yr2ON_UnAoPg@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 08:01:41 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFULd4a6c7YMG=0KHGzKVZCzhqxDY13RTBJMprQ43tqve_FQxg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] x86/percpu: Use segment qualifiers
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, x86@kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
        Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:44=E2=80=AFPM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 12:43, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > So we could do this: we let it live in -tip for a cycle, in a separate
> > branch, and observe what happens - it gets picked up by -next on
> > a daily basis and most x86 developers test it. It won't be merged by ot=
her
> > branches in -tip, it won't be pulled by others or relied on. If it
> > conflicts with other bits we rebase it cleanly, no questions asked.
>
> Sounds like a plan,

Thanks!

Will send a patchset with the config change later today.

Uros.