Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Wed, 04 Oct 2023 11:15:39 +0100
Message-ID: <86jzs2ofqs.wl-maz@kernel.org>
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc:     Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Valentin Schneider <vschneid@redhat.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wenst@chromium.org>,
        AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
        D Scott Phillips <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
        Misono Tomohiro <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: smp: Fix pseudo NMI issues w/ broken Mediatek FW
In-Reply-To: <ZR03liCodnTQWs7s@FVFF77S0Q05N>
References: <20231002094526.1.Ie8f760213053e3d11592f892b30912dbac6b8b48@changeid>
        <ZRr8r7XMoyDKaitd@FVFF77S0Q05N.cambridge.arm.com>
        <CAD=FV=UeeL9uycVeKpOm+eDm3xHrOnKi2frt6a1qFG1HX9yEUg@mail.gmail.com>
        <ZRwJKBZaYwF1rrur@FVFF77S0Q05N>
        <CAD=FV=WASz1uvTgwsu3H3cTr3smHk+E_XNUVnjoPpttwv095rQ@mail.gmail.com>
        <ZRxCCZxZWCG0NBur@FVFF77S0Q05N>
        <CAD=FV=Xk-OMKQPXxU9Z9HOcWwUxxrmLZ4vD0u5ouZRW_zDFDPg@mail.gmail.com>
        <ZR03liCodnTQWs7s@FVFF77S0Q05N>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue)
 FLIM-LB/1.14.9 (=?UTF-8?B?R29qxY0=?=) APEL-LB/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/29.1
 (aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, 04 Oct 2023 10:59:50 +0100,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Given you haven't seen any issues, I suspect those are getting reset to fixed
> values that happens to work out for us, but it is a bit worrisome more
> generally (e.g. the LPI case above).

It is likely that these SoCs don't even have an ITS.

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.