Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20230703142514.363256-1-eperezma@redhat.com> <20230703110241-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
 <ba5099b8-f72c-f267-41a7-d0ee18680796@oracle.com> <20230704061356-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20230704061356-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org>
From:   Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 14:56:53 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJaqyWf7DzJMEUT0NcPeDLQyPkthEJZydnSSPztoCxF6PWEu1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx5_vdpa: offer VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK
To:     "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc:     Si-Wei Liu <si-wei.liu@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, leiyang@redhat.com,
        Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
        Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Jul 4, 2023 at 12:16=E2=80=AFPM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>=
 wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 05:26:02PM -0700, Si-Wei Liu wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 7/3/2023 8:46 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 03, 2023 at 04:25:14PM +0200, Eugenio P=C3=A9rez wrote:
> > > > Offer this backend feature as mlx5 is compatible with it. It allows=
 it
> > > > to do live migration with CVQ, dynamically switching between passth=
rough
> > > > and shadow virtqueue.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eugenio P=C3=A9rez <eperezma@redhat.com>
> > > Same comment.
> > to which?
> >
> > -Siwei
>
> VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK is too narrow a use-case to commit=
 to it
> as a kernel/userspace ABI: what if one wants to start rings in some
> other specific order?
> As was discussed on list, a better promise is not to access ring
> until the 1st kick. vdpa can then do a kick when it wants
> the device to start accessing rings.
>

Friendly ping about this series,

Now that VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK has been merged for
vdpa_sim, does it make sense for mlx too?

Thanks!

> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >   drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c | 7 +++++++
> > > >   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/=
net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > index 9138ef2fb2c8..5f309a16b9dc 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/mlx5/net/mlx5_vnet.c
> > > > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> > > >   #include <uapi/linux/virtio_net.h>
> > > >   #include <uapi/linux/virtio_ids.h>
> > > >   #include <uapi/linux/vdpa.h>
> > > > +#include <uapi/linux/vhost_types.h>
> > > >   #include <linux/virtio_config.h>
> > > >   #include <linux/auxiliary_bus.h>
> > > >   #include <linux/mlx5/cq.h>
> > > > @@ -2499,6 +2500,11 @@ static void unregister_link_notifier(struct =
mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev)
> > > >                   flush_workqueue(ndev->mvdev.wq);
> > > >   }
> > > > +static u64 mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features(const struct vdpa_device=
 *vdpa)
> > > > +{
> > > > + return BIT_ULL(VHOST_BACKEND_F_ENABLE_AFTER_DRIVER_OK);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > >   static int mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features(struct vdpa_device *vdev=
, u64 features)
> > > >   {
> > > >           struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev =3D to_mvdev(vdev);
> > > > @@ -3140,6 +3146,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops mlx5_vdpa=
_ops =3D {
> > > >           .get_vq_align =3D mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_align,
> > > >           .get_vq_group =3D mlx5_vdpa_get_vq_group,
> > > >           .get_device_features =3D mlx5_vdpa_get_device_features,
> > > > + .get_backend_features =3D mlx5_vdpa_get_backend_features,
> > > >           .set_driver_features =3D mlx5_vdpa_set_driver_features,
> > > >           .get_driver_features =3D mlx5_vdpa_get_driver_features,
> > > >           .set_config_cb =3D mlx5_vdpa_set_config_cb,
> > > > --
> > > > 2.39.3
>