Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
Date:   Wed, 4 Oct 2023 09:26:13 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@gmail.com>
Cc:     Rohan G Thomas <rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
        Jose Abreu <joabreu@synopsys.com>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
        netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/1] net: stmmac: xgmac: EST interrupts
 handling
Message-ID: <20231004092613.07cb393f@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <vwdy5d3xirgioeac3mo7ditkfxevwmwmweput3xziq6tafa3zl@vtxddkiv2tux>
References: <20230923031031.21434-1-rohan.g.thomas@intel.com>
        <xwcwjtyy5yx6pruoa3vmssnjzkbeahmfyym4e5lrq2efcwwiym@2upf4ko4mah5>
        <20231002135551.020f180c@kernel.org>
        <vwdy5d3xirgioeac3mo7ditkfxevwmwmweput3xziq6tafa3zl@vtxddkiv2tux>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 14:12:15 +0300 Serge Semin wrote:
> If I didn't miss some details after that we'll have a common EST
> module utilized for both DW QoS Eth and DW XGMAC IP-cores.

So the question now is whether we want Rohan to do this conversion
_first_, in DW QoS 5, and then add xgmac part. Or the patch should
go in as is and you'll follow up with the conversion?