Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759399AbXKNP0l (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:26:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754691AbXKNP0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:26:32 -0500 Received: from fxip-0047f.externet.hu ([88.209.222.127]:59640 "EHLO dorka.pomaz.szeredi.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754586AbXKNP0c (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:26:32 -0500 To: jdike@addtoit.com CC: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@elte.hu In-reply-to: <20071114142247.GA5848@c2.user-mode-linux.org> (message from Jeff Dike on Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:22:47 -0500) Subject: Re: uml doesn't work on 2.6.24-rc2 References: <20071114011002.GA11477@c2.user-mode-linux.org> <20071114142247.GA5848@c2.user-mode-linux.org> Message-Id: From: Miklos Szeredi Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:26:11 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 960 Lines: 27 > > Note, this is 32bit UML on 64bit host, to complicate matters. So I > > think it's not PTRACE_ARCH_PRCTL, but PTRACE_SET_THREAD_AREA. > > Oh, that changes things. In this case, I believe this problem is fixed > by fd181c72a3c202a3986bcee7551c0838265aec2a. This one fixed the EINVAL messages, and now UML boots, but consumes 100% CPU constantly. > You'll also need f86f9e6d66027bdcdc9b40c06d431ee53ea0d509 for a > separate problem. I can't find this in -linus. Which tree is it? > > Maybe this is a fallout from the x86 architecture merge? > > No, the problems had been there from before the merge - years, in the > case of the second one. Never seen anything like this until 2.6.24. Strange... Miklos - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/