Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760365AbXKNRbU (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:31:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755038AbXKNRbM (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:31:12 -0500 Received: from pelian2.kabelfoon.nl ([62.45.45.41]:2580 "EHLO pelian.kabelfoon.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753870AbXKNRbL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:31:11 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 2144 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:31:11 EST Message-ID: <473B287B.2010102@caiway.nl> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 17:55:23 +0100 From: Jan Evert van Grootheest User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20071022) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Bunk CC: Theodore Tso , Benoit Boissinot , Mark Lord , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , David Miller , protasnb@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ne@pimp.vs19.net Subject: Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs References: <20071113031553.3c7b5c16.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.033946.114918709.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113034916.2556edd7.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.035824.40509981.davem@davemloft.net> <20071113041259.79c9a8c5.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20 <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> In-Reply-To: <20071113175610.GE4250@stusta.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2026 Lines: 50 Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:13:56PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > >> On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 04:52:32PM +0100, Benoit Boissinot wrote: >> >>> Btw, I used to test every -mm kernel. But since I've switched distros >>> (gentoo->ubuntu) >>> and I have less time, I feel it's harder to test -rc or -mm kernels (I >>> know this isn't a lkml problem >>> but more a distro problem, but I would love having an ubuntu blessed >>> repo with current dev kernel >>> for the latest stable ubuntu release). >>> >> There are two parts to this. One is a Ubuntu development kernel which >> we can give to large numbers of people to expand our testing pool. >> But if we don't do a better job of responding to bug reports that >> would be generated by expanded testing this won't necessarily help us. >> ... >> > > The main problem aren't missing testers [1] - we already have relatively > experienced people testing kernels and/or reporting bugs, and we slowly > scare them away due to the many bug reports without any reaction. > > The main problem is finding experienced developers who spend time on > looking into bug reports. > > Getting many relatively unexperienced users (who need more guidance for > debugging issues) as additional testers is therefore IMHO not > necessarily a good idea. > > [1] and e.g. when Greg says he has a few hundred people who want to > write drivers it would most likely be possible to find a few > dozen additional -rc testers among them > Hum. If only each of those would squash one bug a week besides their own work... I would expect he's got a handful that know IDE, another group that is into network drivers and so on. I predict that pile of bugs to disappear in weeks (-; Just my $0.02. Jan Evert - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/