Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.36 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.36;
Date:   Thu, 5 Oct 2023 09:38:27 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Eckert <fe@dev.tdt.de>
Cc:     Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
        Eckert.Florian@googlemail.com, pavel@ucw.cz, kabel@kernel.org,
        u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] trigger: ledtrig-tty: move variable definition to
 the top
Message-ID: <2023100508-prelaunch-marbled-3a93@gregkh>
References: <20230928132632.200263-1-fe@dev.tdt.de>
 <20230928132632.200263-4-fe@dev.tdt.de>
 <20231002140559.GB8453@google.com>
 <acda5dc4-e6d3-4870-929f-fb91636b5649@kernel.org>
 <59cc4073a94edbdec5d77f8457ed4f73@dev.tdt.de>
 <05b03f3e-5863-4d33-8c70-03be7d7e972f@kernel.org>
 <d59855493baa936485a2b00aa29d0449@dev.tdt.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <d59855493baa936485a2b00aa29d0449@dev.tdt.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 10:36:09AM +0200, Florian Eckert wrote:
> 
> 
> > > I decided to move the variable definition with a separate commit
> > > to the top of the function, to make the build robot happy. After that
> > > I made my changes for v2 to the ledtrig-tty to add the feature.
> > > 
> > > > Ah, lkp, then also the Closes: line as it suggests.
> > > 
> > > Sorry I do not understand your statement
> > 
> > The link you pasted above states:
> > =======
> > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new
> > version of
> > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > | Closes:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309270440.IJB24Xap-lkp@intel.com/
> > =======
> > 
> > So please follow that suggestion ;).
> 
> Ok, I understand, thanks will to this on a v3 patchset.
> I will now wait for the comments of my changes in ledtrig-tty from the led
> subsystem.
> And then I will send a new patch set with the requested changes.
> 
> Sorry for the silly question. But do I have to send this patch again for a
> v3?
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/f41dc1e1-6d34-48b2-97dd-ba67df6003c6@kernel.org/T/#u
> It was already marked by you with a `Reviewed-by:` from you?

This series is long gone from my review queue, so a v3 will be needed at
the very least.

thanks,

greg k-h