Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761183AbXKNSgi (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:36:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753021AbXKNSg3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:36:29 -0500 Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:50689 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752631AbXKNSg2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:36:28 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:36:25 -0700 From: Alex Chiang To: Gary Hade Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][RFC] Physical PCI slot objects Message-ID: <20071114183625.GC17112@ldl.fc.hp.com> Mail-Followup-To: Alex Chiang , Gary Hade , Matthew Wilcox , Greg KH , gregkh@suse.de, kristen.c.accardi@intel.com, lenb@kernel.org, rick.jones2@hp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, pcihpd-discuss@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: <20071113000853.GA13341@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20071113170129.GA20185@kroah.com> <20071113183353.GE17785@parisc-linux.org> <20071113185122.GA22536@kroah.com> <20071113201102.GK17785@parisc-linux.org> <20071113230804.GA14570@us.ibm.com> <20071114144237.GB7523@ldl.fc.hp.com> <20071114181337.GA6269@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071114181337.GA6269@us.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1235 Lines: 41 Hi Gary, * Gary Hade : > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 07:42:37AM -0700, Alex Chiang wrote: > > Hi Gary, > > > > * Gary Hade : > > > > > > I am not fundamentally opposed to this new capability but share > > > the same concerns that Greg and others have expressed. So far, > > > I have only tried the changes on one single node system (IBM > > > x3850) but the below NAK-worthy result supports the idea that > > > the changes need to be well and widely tested. > > > > Can you send me the lspci -vv and lspci -vt output from this > > machine? > > Alex, I added some slot number hints to the below `lspci -vt` > output. Thanks. > I am still looking at your other message and will have some > hopefully helpful comments soon. I did apply all 5 patches, > 4 was a typo. Actually, I just reworked my patch this morning, and believe that I have a much cleaner implementation now that should fix a lot of the errors you saw. Incoming! Thanks. /ac - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/