Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 02:16:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 02:16:34 -0500 Received: from quechua.inka.de ([212.227.14.2]:22040 "EHLO mail.inka.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 02:16:24 -0500 From: Bernd Eckenfels To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Booting a modular kernel through a multiple streams file In-Reply-To: X-Newsgroups: ka.lists.linux.kernel User-Agent: tin/1.5.8-20010221 ("Blue Water") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.39 (i686)) Message-Id: Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 08:16:24 +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article you wrote: > I know this, and have taken rpm's apart buy hand, and wrote > a small util to take them apart using cpio. I consider it a good > example of Redhat's many screw up's. Deb's use a pair of .tgz's > and header. Much more sane. Well, debian is using an "ar" archive with tar.gz contents. > How many times have you seen ANYTHING ditributed that way? AFAIK cpio is quite common on SysV Systems. The Problem with cpio and tar is, that there are many incompatible versions. Even the Posix.1 format is quite limited (255 char path limit). Some others fail short with symlinks or block device nodes. AFAIK SUS is supporting the use of pax. http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/7908799/xcu/pax.html Greetings Bernd - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/