Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
From:   Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/7] KVM: selftests: x86: sync_regs_test: Use vcpu_run() where appropriate
Date:   Thu,  5 Oct 2023 16:38:33 +0200
Message-ID: <20231005143839.365297-2-thuth@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231005143839.365297-1-thuth@redhat.com>
References: <20231005143839.365297-1-thuth@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

In the spots where we are expecting a successful run, we should
use vcpu_run() instead of _vcpu_run() to make sure that the run
did not fail.

Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
index 00965ba33f730..8c3898cf79b31 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/sync_regs_test.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	/* Request and verify all valid register sets. */
 	/* TODO: BUILD TIME CHECK: TEST_ASSERT(KVM_SYNC_X86_NUM_FIELDS != 3); */
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 
 	vcpu_regs_get(vcpu, &regs);
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = KVM_SYNC_X86_REGS | KVM_SYNC_X86_SREGS;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBAD1DEA + 1,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = 0;
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xDEADBEEF;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx != 0xDEADBEEF,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -317,7 +317,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xAAAA;
 	regs.rbx = 0xBAC0;
 	vcpu_regs_set(vcpu, &regs);
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xAAAA,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	run->kvm_valid_regs = 0;
 	run->kvm_dirty_regs = TEST_SYNC_FIELDS;
 	run->s.regs.regs.rbx = 0xBBBB;
-	rv = _vcpu_run(vcpu);
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
 	TEST_ASSERT_KVM_EXIT_REASON(vcpu, KVM_EXIT_IO);
 	TEST_ASSERT(run->s.regs.regs.rbx == 0xBBBB,
 		    "rbx sync regs value incorrect 0x%llx.",
-- 
2.41.0