Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756622AbXKOF6V (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:58:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751203AbXKOF6N (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:58:13 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:55753 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751127AbXKOF6N (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 00:58:13 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Greg KH Subject: Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 23:58:15 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright References: <200711032351.52977.rob@landley.net> <20071114185444.GB14450@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20071114185444.GB14450@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2005 Lines: 45 On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this: > > > > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o > > In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11, > > from include/asm/tlb.h:4, > > from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8: > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ???tlb_flush_mmu???: > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:76: error: implicit declaration of function > > ???release_pages??? include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function > > ???tlb_remove_page???: > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:105: error: implicit declaration of function > > ???page_cache_release??? make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/smp.o] Error 1 > > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2 > > > > I've been doing the following to fix it. I know it's not the right fix, > > (see the earlier thread about it at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/24/441 ) > > but could the one line fix go into the -stable queue 2.6.23 while a > > proper fix goes into 2.6.24? > > I think the patches that I have just added to the stable queue for > 2.6.23.2 will fix this. If not, please let me know after testing. Where do I find these patches to test? I know where to find the stable releases, but not the "stable queue". Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt just says there _is_ a stable queue, not where to access it. Google's first hit for "linux stable queue" was http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/stable-queue.git;a=shortlog which apparently stopped updating in march... Happy to test the patch you mentioned, if I can figure out where to find it... Thanks, Rob -- "One of my most productive days was throwing away 1000 lines of code." - Ken Thompson. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/