Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757148AbXKOGDW (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:03:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751174AbXKOGDO (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:03:14 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:34803 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751283AbXKOGDN (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:03:13 -0500 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:02:55 -0800 From: Greg KH To: Rob Landley Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeff Dike , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Wright Subject: Re: User Mode Linux still broken in 2.6.23.1 Message-ID: <20071115060255.GA4837@kroah.com> References: <200711032351.52977.rob@landley.net> <20071114185444.GB14450@kroah.com> <200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200711142358.16072.rob@landley.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2246 Lines: 49 On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 11:58:15PM -0600, Rob Landley wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 12:54:44 Greg KH wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:51:50PM -0500, Rob Landley wrote: > > > Building with the attached .config on x86-64, it does this: > > > > > > CC arch/um/kernel/smp.o > > > In file included from include/asm/arch/tlb.h:11, > > > from include/asm/tlb.h:4, > > > from arch/um/kernel/smp.c:8: > > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function ???tlb_flush_mmu???: > > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:76: error: implicit declaration of function > > > ???release_pages??? include/asm-generic/tlb.h: In function > > > ???tlb_remove_page???: > > > include/asm-generic/tlb.h:105: error: implicit declaration of function > > > ???page_cache_release??? make[1]: *** [arch/um/kernel/smp.o] Error 1 > > > make: *** [arch/um/kernel] Error 2 > > > > > > I've been doing the following to fix it. I know it's not the right fix, > > > (see the earlier thread about it at http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/24/441 ) > > > but could the one line fix go into the -stable queue 2.6.23 while a > > > proper fix goes into 2.6.24? > > > > I think the patches that I have just added to the stable queue for > > 2.6.23.2 will fix this. If not, please let me know after testing. > > Where do I find these patches to test? I know where to find the stable > releases, but not the "stable queue". > > Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt just says there _is_ a stable queue, not > where to access it. Google's first hit for "linux stable queue" was > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/chrisw/stable-queue.git;a=shortlog > which apparently stopped updating in march... > > Happy to test the patch you mentioned, if I can figure out where to find it... It's at: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary Chris and I used to have separate queues, but that got messy, I suppose we should just delete those old copies... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/