Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.33 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.33;
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] bpf/selftests: Test pinning bpf timer to
 a core
To:     David Vernet <void@manifault.com>, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
        martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
        john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
        haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@meta.com
References: <20231004162339.200702-1-void@manifault.com>
 <20231004162339.200702-3-void@manifault.com>
From:   Hou Tao <houtao@huaweicloud.com>
Message-ID: <0e31e33b-adab-3d4e-be45-f9d5231fdc11@huaweicloud.com>
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2023 12:23:17 +0800
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20231004162339.200702-3-void@manifault.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Precedence: bulk


On 10/5/2023 12:23 AM, David Vernet wrote:
> Now that we support pinning a BPF timer to the current core, we should
> test it with some selftests. This patch adds two new testcases to the
> timer suite, which verifies that a BPF timer both with and without
> BPF_F_TIMER_ABS, can be pinned to the calling core with
> BPF_F_TIMER_CPU_PIN.
>
> Acked-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>

Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>