Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.37 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.37;
Message-ID: <22b74194-2701-47b4-a8cc-3e41ceb326d6@infradead.org>
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2023 07:07:24 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>,
        kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
        maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
        tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Hi,

On 10/8/23 00:06, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> Identified below document warning in latest linux-next.
> ./include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h:49: warning: Cannot understand
> * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX: on line 49 - I thought it was a doc line
> 
> Also, on running checkpatch.pl to nouveau_drm.h identified
> few more warnings/errors and fixing them in this patch
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
> ---
>  include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> index eaf9f248619f..a523ca5aa865 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/drm/nouveau_drm.h
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ extern "C" {
>  #define NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_HAS_PAGEFLIP    16
>  
>  /**
> - * @NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX
> + * NOUVEAU_GETPARAM_EXEC_PUSH_MAX:

Yes, this does quieten the kernel-doc warning, but the produced html output
is not correct.

I had sent a patch for this but it was incomplete (missing full commit message).
I have just sent a v2:
  https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231008140231.17921-1-rdunlap@infradead.org/


>   *
>   * Query the maximum amount of IBs that can be pushed through a single
>   * &drm_nouveau_exec structure and hence a single &DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_EXEC
> @@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
>  
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC      DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
>  
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
>  
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF        DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
>  
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)

-- 
~Randy