Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:5 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:5;
Date:   Sun, 8 Oct 2023 21:11:04 +0700
From:   Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To:     Bragatheswaran Manickavel <bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>,
        kherbst@redhat.com, lyude@redhat.com, dakr@redhat.com,
        maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com, mripard@kernel.org,
        tzimmermann@suse.de, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch
Cc:     dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/nouveau: fix kernel-doc warning
Message-ID: <ZSK4eNUPYIqPF3fM@debian.me>
References: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NyY6YWaxLzVX3FT9"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20231008070618.20640-1-bragathemanick0908@gmail.com>
Precedence: bulk


--NyY6YWaxLzVX3FT9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Oct 08, 2023 at 12:36:18PM +0530, Bragatheswaran Manickavel wrote:
> @@ -458,15 +458,15 @@ struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind {
> =20
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GETPARAM, struct drm_nouveau_getparam)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC      DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_ALLOC, struct drm_nouveau_channel_alloc)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + =
DRM_NOUVEAU_CHANNEL_FREE, struct drm_nouveau_channel_free)
> =20
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_svm_init)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_SVM_BIND, struct drm_nouveau_svm_bind)
> =20
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_NEW, struct drm_nouveau_gem_new)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF        DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_PUSHBUF, struct drm_nouveau_gem_pushbuf)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> -#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW (DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + =
DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_PREP, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_prep)
> +#define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI       DRM_IOW(DRM_COMMAND_BASE + =
DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_CPU_FINI, struct drm_nouveau_gem_cpu_fini)
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO           DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_GEM_INFO, struct drm_nouveau_gem_info)
> =20
>  #define DRM_IOCTL_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT            DRM_IOWR(DRM_COMMAND_BASE +=
 DRM_NOUVEAU_VM_INIT, struct drm_nouveau_vm_init)

Can you please split checkpatch fix above into separate patch?

--=20
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

--NyY6YWaxLzVX3FT9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEABYKAB0WIQSSYQ6Cy7oyFNCHrUH2uYlJVVFOowUCZSK4dwAKCRD2uYlJVVFO
ow1cAQDVcS0V99/qpu73ULyxIv/J+8DZ7JV9q172/0v22KhgWQEA4slaxL7vNv9D
tEdpFPiHgSg5FsYifzU9Rtf8fy38fAs=
=INQ7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NyY6YWaxLzVX3FT9--