Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758293AbXKONFx (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:05:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751687AbXKONFm (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:05:42 -0500 Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:46384 "EHLO longford.lazybastard.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbXKONFl (ORCPT ); Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:05:41 -0500 Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:00:20 +0100 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel To: Rene Herman Cc: Bron Gondwana , David Miller , rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-pcmcia@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, protasnb@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-input@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [BUG] New Kernel Bugs Message-ID: <20071115130019.GB10165@lazybastard.org> References: <20071113143201.9441c940.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20071113.175551.131375600.davem@davemloft.net> <20071114095507.GA32595@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <20071114.020706.219917088.davem@davemloft.net> <473AE010.4090806@keyaccess.nl> <20071115041613.GC15302@brong.net> <473BE046.8070804@keyaccess.nl> <20071115120232.GB8297@brong.net> <473C3B0B.30206@keyaccess.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <473C3B0B.30206@keyaccess.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1558 Lines: 35 On Thu, 15 November 2007 13:26:51 +0100, Rene Herman wrote: > > Can you please just shelve this crap? You have a way of knowing that "ALSA > will accept you" and that is knowing or assuming that the ALSA project > doesn't consist of drooling retards. Well, my experience with moderation has been that moderated mails are stuck in some queue for weeks. Two seperate lists, neither of them was alsa. If also is doing a better job, great. But it still has to live with the general reputation of non-subscriber moderation. > When a project list goes to the difficulty of moderating non-subscribers it > has made the explicit choice to _not_ become subscriber only. Then refusing > valid non-subscribers after all makes no sense whatsoever. I'm sorry you > got your feelings hurt by that other list but it was no doubt an accident; > take it up with them. Been there, done that. In spite of people not being drooling retards, the amount of time and effort they invest into either moderation or improving the ruleset is quite limited. Problems persist. And even without mails being held hostage for weeks, every single moderation mail is annoying. Like the one I'm sure to receive after sending this out. Jörn -- Joern's library part 5: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/compression-faq/part2/section-9.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/