Received: by 2002:a05:7412:da14:b0:e2:908c:2ebd with SMTP id fe20csp2264754rdb; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:22:33 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEtCTA5Mj30+UaA12FkrEilXNfBDWQ7/DAvO38r0DVlJ/DMWOc/sNvbzkgkOcGL0rlSX01o X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:ec90:b0:1c7:27a1:a9e5 with SMTP id x16-20020a170902ec9000b001c727a1a9e5mr22625967plg.33.1696908153611; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:22:33 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1696908153; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=XanmWzL7wT/mHcH0oDlCU1dobEjeRXtEdwvn1cYEj+SjpNtfpymuEuza6IL0Y/kLRN NrKrDU2Y/vVQkTf/w71lqmhTAHn8Nw+cK9xtYlhgAxKG8TokhypETFT0syWdkxLdImfk 1ZxE9/4u6K76tbO1DEIaAHC0t6c5zWy1/h2I8UfCRwMcC3W1YWBnM8VNDSRvuUCB7lrh yxLieDaPbvqKWiEaqXxxLKypcVc5/j7ofK+duh8j4We56tIuxW/dngcVLr62bjlbwuvw ESUF35eS87ApRkhVWYaz2zp+o29bZ/7tEk1myRS1bmFZ9v83IfJ27F1L1yXwwz+S+6/H 4NuQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:in-reply-to:date:dkim-signature; bh=XEDO979juocfA6e748Gdg1ojA/11BVhtMp+K0OvWH0c=; fh=i6r7D8Tbv5L0V2RUiJXfGU+sNI1eFV0UjCNL0oNyQ80=; b=MuFhi6D5Aox88O1E96TEpEYDegt/8GZnS4tBhyijA0Ti/TWkCLycYDn1O0JQjjAzgw 4ket4asHfBpfPIHXFZZ0UdzclrQX2pWrF/X9Yj1tsOwI8MPiAXXAoMELGfa4TzvFOYNP UOqtdddFTcVqgbDQ3MgEdLG/mDtiWUr6o6r9XfThMXd/FmJL1Pv6HnWU4vtgeuYgeOsg GfEf1/D8RzTL9MF5qd7J1ei/0pSFxjLNEibLunnc4TPCGAO+zjI8+cKkekRAI+mUoYiS yLiVTaTZK2VNGJ+IP2NUrxlM5veqAY2xvVw+j5n960Oe5LVvqWhPjx/CHuMC6YdZzil8 xwLQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=cFy98Pfi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from groat.vger.email (groat.vger.email. [23.128.96.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f11-20020a170902684b00b001c88fd958ecsi1031826pln.110.2023.10.09.20.22.33 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:22:33 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.35; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20230601 header.b=cFy98Pfi; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.35 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: from out1.vger.email (depot.vger.email [IPv6:2620:137:e000::3:0]) by groat.vger.email (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B808076CB8; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:22:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.10 at groat.vger.email Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1441994AbjJJDVf (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:21:35 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:37722 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1441974AbjJJDV3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Oct 2023 23:21:29 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-x1149.google.com (mail-yw1-x1149.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1149]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6596AAC for ; Mon, 9 Oct 2023 20:21:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yw1-x1149.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-59f61a639b9so80191267b3.1 for ; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:21:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1696908085; x=1697512885; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XEDO979juocfA6e748Gdg1ojA/11BVhtMp+K0OvWH0c=; b=cFy98PfiP1+ILre97PV1XvTfRsee/TTpqaTzPcb3lr1BPgIL0Ad5lTdIa415wsXVHg HuB/Hj3rQnaFIaGVZqqCy4MoHYCCZcPUekhXpQ/enyXWmNWV64aiUWHTE0Xz54v4r4HW B8CI2VOMQuGIyT13hvqx5JsRUnTfTVdXmX731migJxMCa8/oE7DOCuZskaK+GgEjP8u2 LIumpbii48bruRrZMfoHp/IbZJjd17RSQGfidbFMBzQEKdg9+PovxJhfNQ+KCPEXbD5U UnohDJ+VYmnYzffFzV/yWz4u1niGoDp/JhjHjhV8QUEOzsHaKe89SDIP3n0HCU5vCutq A4dQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1696908085; x=1697512885; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:references:mime-version:in-reply-to :date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=XEDO979juocfA6e748Gdg1ojA/11BVhtMp+K0OvWH0c=; b=IOyEfhchvqWyHNCrsrm4VbkIaPvD6r39jGRESE8RrDcA8vBC1QWUtAg0/kHn0cAirt 7bw5Q0Yuh43ql+U2NLNYuoHGUbia9DsC7SY+US8/l7dD/5bSrGU/pY80qkkPV8ShQ+Q4 yrQJYMtlK0Nto8+6C5JNlvlNaRPG5BPRPT/iJHggCzCiimJHDzUMiKRMGTS5Q9fA+MoJ w47i8d8lWbyJYMrcHkdrHuILBwQ9l5VigCbjDmStk0UWDZ0Rrh4p+bu2E4TNTlCoRpdu CMyGpXszHvhvxigAs08F33wDCdwNpbJpRXlski0mrY+NAxTZjf1dXSn//IGuT150g2hM 0NOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzBidz/GFGplZ/pU5C0LuCDh/1W5FaM1s4H6wgLz7S1+CRpnj4a 6aCiLiBh+3lwYUOHPvVE0m8XDNWSZwAljXnx X-Received: from yosry.c.googlers.com ([fda3:e722:ac3:cc00:20:ed76:c0a8:29b4]) (user=yosryahmed job=sendgmr) by 2002:a81:b209:0:b0:59b:e1db:562c with SMTP id q9-20020a81b209000000b0059be1db562cmr319164ywh.5.1696908085640; Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:21:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 03:21:14 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20231010032117.1577496-1-yosryahmed@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20231010032117.1577496-1-yosryahmed@google.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog Message-ID: <20231010032117.1577496-4-yosryahmed@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2 3/5] mm: memcg: make stats flushing threshold per-memcg From: Yosry Ahmed To: Andrew Morton Cc: Johannes Weiner , Michal Hocko , Roman Gushchin , Shakeel Butt , Muchun Song , Ivan Babrou , Tejun Heo , "=?UTF-8?q?Michal=20Koutn=C3=BD?=" , Waiman Long , kernel-team@cloudflare.com, Wei Xu , Greg Thelen , linux-mm@kvack.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yosry Ahmed Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on groat.vger.email Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (groat.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 20:22:30 -0700 (PDT) A global counter for the magnitude of memcg stats update is maintained on the memcg side to avoid invoking rstat flushes when the pending updates are not significant. This avoids unnecessary flushes, which are not very cheap even if there isn't a lot of stats to flush. It also avoids unnecessary lock contention on the underlying global rstat lock. Make this threshold per-memcg. The scheme is followed where percpu (now also per-memcg) counters are incremented in the update path, and only propagated to per-memcg atomics when they exceed a certain threshold. This provides two benefits: (a) On large machines with a lot of memcgs, the global threshold can be reached relatively fast, so guarding the underlying lock becomes less effective. Making the threshold per-memcg avoids this. (b) Having a global threshold makes it hard to do subtree flushes, as we cannot reset the global counter except for a full flush. Per-memcg counters removes this as a blocker from doing subtree flushes, which helps avoid unnecessary work when the stats of a small subtree are needed. Nothing is free, of course. This comes at a cost: (a) A new per-cpu counter per memcg, consuming NR_CPUS * NR_MEMCGS * 4 bytes. The extra memory usage is insigificant. (b) More work on the update side, although in the common case it will only be percpu counter updates. The amount of work scales with the number of ancestors (i.e. tree depth). This is not a new concept, adding a cgroup to the rstat tree involves a parent loop, so is charging. Testing results below show no significant regressions. (c) The error margin in the stats for the system as a whole increases from NR_CPUS * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH to NR_CPUS * MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * NR_MEMCGS. This is probably fine because we have a similar per-memcg error in charges coming from percpu stocks, and we have a periodic flusher that makes sure we always flush all the stats every 2s anyway. This patch was tested to make sure no significant regressions are introduced on the update path as follows. The following benchmarks were ran in a cgroup that is 4 levels deep (/sys/fs/cgroup/a/b/c/d), which is deeper than a usual setup: (a) neper [1] with 1000 flows and 100 threads (single machine). The values in the table are the average of server and client throughputs in mbps after 30 iterations, each running for 30s: tcp_rr tcp_stream Base 9504218.56 357366.84 Patched 9656205.68 356978.39 Delta +1.6% -0.1% Standard Deviation 0.95% 1.03% An increase in the performance of tcp_rr doesn't really make sense, but it's probably in the noise. The same tests were ran with 1 flow and 1 thread but the throughput was too noisy to make any conclusions (the averages did not show regressions nonetheless). Looking at perf for one iteration of the above test, __mod_memcg_state() (which is where memcg_rstat_updated() is called) does not show up at all without this patch, but it shows up with this patch as 1.06% for tcp_rr and 0.36% for tcp_stream. (b) "stress-ng --vm 0 -t 1m --times --perf". I don't understand stress-ng very well, so I am not sure that's the best way to test this, but it spawns 384 workers and spits a lot of metrics which looks nice :) I picked a few ones that seem to be relevant to the stats update path. I also included cache misses as this patch introduce more atomics that may bounce between cpu caches: Metric Base Patched Delta Cache Misses 3.394 B/sec 3.433 B/sec +1.14% Cache L1D Read 0.148 T/sec 0.154 T/sec +4.05% Cache L1D Read Miss 20.430 B/sec 21.820 B/sec +6.8% Page Faults Total 4.304 M/sec 4.535 M/sec +5.4% Page Faults Minor 4.304 M/sec 4.535 M/sec +5.4% Page Faults Major 18.794 /sec 0.000 /sec Kmalloc 0.153 M/sec 0.152 M/sec -0.65% Kfree 0.152 M/sec 0.153 M/sec +0.65% MM Page Alloc 4.640 M/sec 4.898 M/sec +5.56% MM Page Free 4.639 M/sec 4.897 M/sec +5.56% Lock Contention Begin 0.362 M/sec 0.479 M/sec +32.32% Lock Contention End 0.362 M/sec 0.479 M/sec +32.32% page-cache add 238.057 /sec 0.000 /sec page-cache del 6.265 /sec 6.267 /sec -0.03% This is only using a single run in each case. I am not sure what to make out of most of these numbers, but they mostly seem in the noise (some better, some worse). The lock contention numbers are interesting. I am not sure if higher is better or worse here. No new locks or lock sections are introduced by this patch either way. Looking at perf, __mod_memcg_state() shows up as 0.00% with and without this patch. This is suspicious, but I verified while stress-ng is running that all the threads are in the right cgroup. (3) will-it-scale page_fault tests. These tests (specifically per_process_ops in page_fault3 test) detected a 25.9% regression before for a change in the stats update path [2]. These are the numbers from 30 runs (+ is good): LABEL | MEAN | MEDIAN | STDDEV | ------------------------------+-------------+-------------+------------- page_fault1_per_process_ops | | | | (A) base | 265207.738 | 262941.000 | 12112.379 | (B) patched | 249249.191 | 248781.000 | 8767.457 | | -6.02% | -5.39% | | page_fault1_per_thread_ops | | | | (A) base | 241618.484 | 240209.000 | 10162.207 | (B) patched | 229820.671 | 229108.000 | 7506.582 | | -4.88% | -4.62% | | page_fault1_scalability | | | (A) base | 0.03545 | 0.035705 | 0.0015837 | (B) patched | 0.029952 | 0.029957 | 0.0013551 | | -9.29% | -9.35% | | page_fault2_per_process_ops | | | (A) base | 203916.148 | 203496.000 | 2908.331 | (B) patched | 186975.419 | 187023.000 | 1991.100 | | -6.85% | -6.90% | | page_fault2_per_thread_ops | | | (A) base | 170604.972 | 170532.000 | 1624.834 | (B) patched | 163100.260 | 163263.000 | 1517.967 | | -4.40% | -4.26% | | page_fault2_scalability | | | (A) base | 0.054603 | 0.054693 | 0.00080196 | (B) patched | 0.044882 | 0.044957 | 0.0011766 | | -0.05% | +0.33% | | page_fault3_per_process_ops | | | (A) base | 1299821.099 | 1297918.000 | 9882.872 | (B) patched | 1248700.839 | 1247168.000 | 8454.891 | | -3.93% | -3.91% | | page_fault3_per_thread_ops | | | (A) base | 387216.963 | 387115.000 | 1605.760 | (B) patched | 368538.213 | 368826.000 | 1852.594 | | -4.82% | -4.72% | | page_fault3_scalability | | | (A) base | 0.59909 | 0.59367 | 0.01256 | (B) patched | 0.59995 | 0.59769 | 0.010088 | | +0.14% | +0.68% | | There is some microbenchmarks regressions (and some minute improvements), but nothing outside the normal variance of this benchmark between kernel versions. The fix for [2] assumes that 3% is noise -- and there were no further practical complaints), so hopefully this means that such variations in these microbenchmarks do not reflect on practical workloads. [1]https://github.com/google/neper [2]https://lore.kernel.org/all/20190520063534.GB19312@shao2-debian/ Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed --- mm/memcontrol.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c index a393f1399a2b..9a586893bd3e 100644 --- a/mm/memcontrol.c +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c @@ -627,6 +627,9 @@ struct memcg_vmstats_percpu { /* Cgroup1: threshold notifications & softlimit tree updates */ unsigned long nr_page_events; unsigned long targets[MEM_CGROUP_NTARGETS]; + + /* Stats updates since the last flush */ + unsigned int stats_updates; }; struct memcg_vmstats { @@ -641,6 +644,9 @@ struct memcg_vmstats { /* Pending child counts during tree propagation */ long state_pending[MEMCG_NR_STAT]; unsigned long events_pending[NR_MEMCG_EVENTS]; + + /* Stats updates since the last flush */ + atomic64_t stats_updates; }; /* @@ -660,9 +666,7 @@ struct memcg_vmstats { */ static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w); static DECLARE_DEFERRABLE_WORK(stats_flush_dwork, flush_memcg_stats_dwork); -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, stats_updates); static atomic_t stats_flush_ongoing = ATOMIC_INIT(0); -static atomic_t stats_flush_threshold = ATOMIC_INIT(0); static u64 flush_last_time; #define FLUSH_TIME (2UL*HZ) @@ -689,26 +693,37 @@ static void memcg_stats_unlock(void) preempt_enable_nested(); } + +static bool memcg_should_flush_stats(struct mem_cgroup *memcg) +{ + return atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates) > + MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH * num_online_cpus(); +} + static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val) { + int cpu = smp_processor_id(); unsigned int x; if (!val) return; - cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, smp_processor_id()); + cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, cpu); + + for (; memcg; memcg = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg)) { + x = __this_cpu_add_return(memcg->vmstats_percpu->stats_updates, + abs(val)); + + if (x < MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH) + continue; - x = __this_cpu_add_return(stats_updates, abs(val)); - if (x > MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH) { /* - * If stats_flush_threshold exceeds the threshold - * (>num_online_cpus()), cgroup stats update will be triggered - * in __mem_cgroup_flush_stats(). Increasing this var further - * is redundant and simply adds overhead in atomic update. + * If @memcg is already flush-able, increasing stats_updates is + * redundant. Avoid the overhead of the atomic update. */ - if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) <= num_online_cpus()) - atomic_add(x / MEMCG_CHARGE_BATCH, &stats_flush_threshold); - __this_cpu_write(stats_updates, 0); + if (!memcg_should_flush_stats(memcg)) + atomic64_add(x, &memcg->vmstats->stats_updates); + __this_cpu_write(memcg->vmstats_percpu->stats_updates, 0); } } @@ -727,13 +742,12 @@ static void do_flush_stats(void) cgroup_rstat_flush(root_mem_cgroup->css.cgroup); - atomic_set(&stats_flush_threshold, 0); atomic_set(&stats_flush_ongoing, 0); } void mem_cgroup_flush_stats(void) { - if (atomic_read(&stats_flush_threshold) > num_online_cpus()) + if (memcg_should_flush_stats(root_mem_cgroup)) do_flush_stats(); } @@ -747,8 +761,8 @@ void mem_cgroup_flush_stats_ratelimited(void) static void flush_memcg_stats_dwork(struct work_struct *w) { /* - * Always flush here so that flushing in latency-sensitive paths is - * as cheap as possible. + * Deliberately ignore memcg_should_flush_stats() here so that flushing + * in latency-sensitive paths is as cheap as possible. */ do_flush_stats(); queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &stats_flush_dwork, FLUSH_TIME); @@ -5803,6 +5817,9 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_rstat_flush(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css, int cpu) } } } + /* We are in a per-cpu loop here, only do the atomic write once */ + if (atomic64_read(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates)) + atomic64_set(&memcg->vmstats->stats_updates, 0); } #ifdef CONFIG_MMU -- 2.42.0.609.gbb76f46606-goog