Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:6 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:6;
Received-SPF: Pass (protection.outlook.com: domain of nvidia.com designates
 216.228.117.160 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com;
 client-ip=216.228.117.160; helo=mail.nvidia.com; pr=C
Message-ID: <d4b62c0e-f07c-93a2-6d81-63373d7fff87@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2023 11:13:19 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/102.11.0
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 0/2] Improvements to the Tegra CPUFREQ driver
Content-Language: en-US
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
CC:     <rafael@kernel.org>, <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        <treding@nvidia.com>, <jonathanh@nvidia.com>, <bbasu@nvidia.com>,
        <amiettinen@nvidia.com>, Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
References: <20231004140537.1954-1-sumitg@nvidia.com>
 <72e9f769-9cbb-274e-e99d-10c71f84bbe0@nvidia.com>
 <20231010053710.hrq3ifktt7j4n4ln@vireshk-i7>
From:   Sumit Gupta <sumitg@nvidia.com>
In-Reply-To: <20231010053710.hrq3ifktt7j4n4ln@vireshk-i7>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Oct 2023 05:43:39.3826
 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 50d0393a-f116-42e3-ac35-08dbc953dae6
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=43083d15-7273-40c1-b7db-39efd9ccc17a;Ip=[216.228.117.160];Helo=[mail.nvidia.com]
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: CY4PEPF0000EDD6.namprd03.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Anonymous
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH7PR12MB5928
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,
	URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on pete.vger.email
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (pete.vger.email [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 09 Oct 2023 22:43:54 -0700 (PDT)


On 10/10/23 11:07, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> 
> 
> On 09-10-23, 17:06, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 04/10/23 19:35, Sumit Gupta wrote:
>>> This patch set adds below improvements to the Tegra194 CPUFREQ driver.
>>> They are applicable to all the Tegra SoC's supported by the driver.
>>>
>>> 1) Patch 1: Avoid making SMP call on every frequency request to reduce
>>>      the time for frequency set and get calls.
>>>
>>> 2) Patch 2: Use reference clock count based loop instead of udelay()
>>>      to improve the accuracy of re-generated CPU frequency.
>>>
>>> The patches are not related but have minor conflict. So, need to be
>>> applied in order of patch numbers. If 'Patch 2' is to be applied first
>>> then will rebase that and send separately.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> v1[2] -> v3:
>>> - Patch 1: used sizeof(*data->cpu_data) in devm_kcalloc().
>>>
>>> v1[1] -> v2:
>>> - Patch 1: added new patch.
>>> - Patch 2: changed subject and patch order.
>>>
>>> Sumit Gupta (2):
>>>     cpufreq: tegra194: save CPU data to avoid repeated SMP calls
>>>     cpufreq: tegra194: use refclk delta based loop instead of udelay
>>>
>>>    drivers/cpufreq/tegra194-cpufreq.c | 151 ++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>>    1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901164113.29139-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230901152046.25662-1-sumitg@nvidia.com/
>>>
>>
>> Hi Viresh,
>>
>> If there is no further comment.
>> Can we please still apply these patches for 6.7 ?
> 
> Applied. Thanks.
> 
> FWIW, you should have rebased the other commit (which removes cpu
> online mask) over this one. I had to fix the commit manually now.
> 
> --
> viresh

Sorry, my bad.
Thank you for your help.

Best Regards,
Sumit Gupta