Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:14:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:13:44 -0500 Received: from f113.pav1.hotmail.com ([64.4.31.113]:50705 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:13:26 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [128.107.253.38] From: "Eyal Sohya" To: dana.lacoste@peregrine.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 14:13:20 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2001 14:13:20.0356 (UTC) FILETIME=[F9771240:01C18BBB] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >From: Alan Cox >To: dana.lacoste@peregrine.com (Dana Lacoste) >CC: linuz_kernel_q@hotmail.com ('Eyal Sohya'), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 15:04:13 +0000 (GMT) > > > > 1. Are we satisfied with the source code control system ? > > > > Yes. Alan (2.2) and Marcelo (2.4) and Linus (2.5) are doing > > a good job with source control. really ? Do you know what good source control is ? i doubt it. > >Not really. We do a passable job. Stuff gets dropped, lost, >deferred and forgotten, applied when it conflicts with other work >- much of this stuff that software wouldnt actually improve on over a >person > > > Although this seems annoying, it's just one facet of the > > primary difference between Linux and a commercially based > > kernel : if you want to know how something works and how > > it's being developed, then you MUST participate, in this > > and other mailing lists. > >That wont help you - most discussion occurs in private because l/k >is too noisy and many key people dont read it. > > > > 3. There is no central bug tracking database. At least people > > > should know the status of the bugs they have found with some > > > releases. > > > > There is no central product, so there can be no central bug track. > > (see below) > >Rubbish. Ask the engineering world about fault tracking. You won't get >"different products no central flaw tracking" you'll get extensive cross >correlation, statistical tools and the like in any syste, where reliability >matters > >Many kernel bug reports end up invisible to some of the developers. that is exactly my point. > >Alan _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/