Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::3:8 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::3:8;
Date:   Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:07:01 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
To:     Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Cc:     niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se,
        yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org
Subject: Re: renesas_sdhi problems in 5.10-stable was Re: [PATCH 5.10
 000/226] 5.10.198-rc1 review
Message-ID: <ZSWg1fv3gOyV5t+h@shikoro>
Mail-Followup-To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
        Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>, niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se,
        yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, geert+renesas@glider.be,
        biju.das.jz@bp.renesas.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Chris.Paterson2@renesas.com, stable@vger.kernel.org,
        patches@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux@roeck-us.net, shuah@kernel.org, patches@kernelci.org,
        lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com,
        srw@sladewatkins.net, rwarsow@gmx.de, conor@kernel.org
References: <20231009130126.697995596@linuxfoundation.org>
 <ZSRVgj5AqJbDXqZU@duo.ucw.cz>
 <ZSRe78MAQwbBdyFP@duo.ucw.cz>
 <ZSUy+zA0+Chm6dFb@duo.ucw.cz>
 <ZSU+GHl1q7T/TBp5@duo.ucw.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/kp/j1jVUyZUkyH2"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <ZSU+GHl1q7T/TBp5@duo.ucw.cz>
Precedence: bulk


--/kp/j1jVUyZUkyH2
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hi Pavel,

> And testing failed. So
>=20
> commit f5799b4e142884c2e7aa99f813113af4a3395ffb
> Author: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Date:   Tue Nov 10 15:20:57 2020 +0100
>=20
>     mmc: renesas_sdhi: populate SCC pointer at the proper place
>    =20
>     [ Upstream commit d14ac691bb6f6ebaa7eeec21ca04dd47300ff5b6 ]
>=20
> seems to be the buggy commit that breaks renesas boards in 5.10.

This patch was part of a series. Did the other two patches come with it?

b161d87dfd3d ("mmc: renesas_sdhi: probe into TMIO after SCC parameters have=
 been setup")
45bffc371fef ("mmc: renesas_sdhi: only reset SCC when its pointer is popula=
ted")

If not, I could imagine that could lead to a crash. No idea why only
with 5.10, though.

Happy hacking,

   Wolfram


--/kp/j1jVUyZUkyH2
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=lHJO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/kp/j1jVUyZUkyH2--