Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:18:47 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:18:38 -0500 Received: from f226.pav1.hotmail.com ([64.4.31.226]:7443 "EHLO hotmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 23 Dec 2001 09:18:18 -0500 X-Originating-IP: [128.107.253.38] From: "Eyal Sohya" To: merlin@transgeek.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking Date: Sun, 23 Dec 2001 14:18:11 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Dec 2001 14:18:11.0960 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7464F80:01C18BBC] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org But does our final arbiter intervene when he should ? Would he step in to stop a discussion thread from becoming a ego bash in the larger interests of the kernel ? >From: Craig Christophel >To: "Eyal Sohya" >CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: The direction linux is taking >Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 01:11:15 -0500 > >The aggressive nature of the list is a result of people who have all spent >a >great deal of time researching kernel internals. It is much akin to a >thesis >proposal and defense that you would see in an educational environment. It >may not be the most comfortable thing in the world, but it gets the base >issues resolved, because if you do not know what is going on someone WILL >tell you. -- and then you revise and defend. think of it as an academic >discussion forum -- where people (usually) have the right to sound off. >There is normally no harm done, although the recent MM discussions have >been >a bit heated. > > > >Craig. > > > >On Tuesday 18 December 2001 00:20, Eyal Sohya wrote: > > I've watched this List and have some questions to ask > > which i would appreciate are answered. Some might not > > have definite answers and we might be divided on them. > > > > 1. Are we satisfied with the source code control system ? > > 2. Is there enough planning for documentation ? As another > > poster mentioned, there are new API and we dont know about > > them. > > 3. There is no central bug tracking database. At least people > > should know the status of the bugs they have found with some > > releases. > > 4. Aggressive nature of this mailing list itself may be a > > turn off to many who would like to contribute. > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: > > http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx > > > > - > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" >in > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ _________________________________________________________________ MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos: http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/